Mihangel Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 47 minutes ago, duncanjwitham said: I certainly read it the other way. No, taxman is still unpaid, and the charge is still on the crime sheet. I read it as a sign of the breakdown in modern literacy levels. The question is a bit awkward to read, the answer completely unclear and they both. lack. the ability to, punctuate. rammieib, RoyMac5, Arsene Titman and 1 other 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodley Ram Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 1 hour ago, Ghost of Clough said: You can see the current reasons for the embargo here. yep, I know that and that is covered in my question. I just wanted to make sure there was nothing else apart from the EFL stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 22 minutes ago, hintonsboots said: Needs to put his mob on record then transcribe the entire meeting for the forum, or will a NDA be signed ? No point In meeting if NDA signed lol RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinhectoring Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 3 hours ago, Sparkle said: I think you can read that completely the other way round? Classic Nixon, pretending he knows what is going on when he does not - and responding to a tweet he hasn’t read carefully enough. rammieib 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaspode Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 The longer this riudiculous situation drags on the more likely it it that the EFL lift the embargo just as the August tranfer window shuts (or possibly after the January window to really hammer it home) - Mel could have 'I love the EFL' tattooed on his backside and parade starkers outside Buckingham Palace and they'd still keep on with their vindictive crusade. An utterly pathetic organisation that day by day shows it is unfit to govern the game and that needs replacing asap...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodypecker Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 Wayne's '48 hours to signings' is well past...quelle surprise! Perhaps some EFL embargo conditions might be met shortly - then we will get snared by the inability (or by an 'unforseen' EFL delay) to register incoming players before the admin deadline, so that they can't play on Saturday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gccrowdpleaser Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 16 minutes ago, Woodypecker said: Wayne's '48 hours to signings' is well past...quelle surprise! Perhaps some EFL embargo conditions might be met shortly - then we will get snared by the inability (or by an 'unforseen' EFL delay) to register incoming players before the admin deadline, so that they can't play on Saturday! 48 hours errr this week....is the exact quote from Rooney. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodypecker Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 eerrrrm...yes, I know! He should have known better than to give a time-frame LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 6 hours ago, Curtains said: No point In meeting if NDA signed lol It'd still be quite disappointing if it's all under NDA, but probably still worth having some kind of meeting. Probably more likely there'll be certain parts which have to remain confidential but quite a few things that can be discussed openly. However, it does offer the prospect of being able to claim to things and being ITK from the meeting and forum wars over who really are the illuminarti. "I was at the meeting....obviously, under te NDA I can't tell you what I know, but there's some very exciting things happening, obviously, the current board think rooney is doing a fantastic job (because they can't afford to sack him) however, the new owners have their own plans based on world domination and have more money than god, situation with the EFL entirely the EFL's fault and not Morris or Pearce, genuinly believe the squad is stong enough (becasue they can't afford to bring anyone in)." Curtains 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BodminRam Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 I wonder how many extra tickets were sold when WR said more players in 48 hours Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hintonsboots Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 Next time I buy a season ticket I’m going to tell the club I’ll pay for it in 48 hours, that should give me a few months of credit. Wsm-ram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gringo Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 My UK business wrote to HMRC on the 6th June this year about a very important and specific issue which 2 years ago would have been answered by return, it is now some 8 weeks later and no reply. I understand a lot of the staff at HMRC are working from home, this may explain not getting a formal response from them to show the EFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yani P Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 Similar I have so many dealings with HMRC as moved businesses to Canada..my experience over the past year is they are working 3-6 months longer for replies to certain actions.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hintonsboots Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 5 minutes ago, Charlotte Ram said: My UK business wrote to HMRC on the 6th June this year about a very important and specific issue which 2 years ago would have been answered by return, it is now some 8 weeks later and no reply. I understand a lot of the staff at HMRC are working from home, this may explain not getting a formal response from them to show the EFL. It would depend on the size of the business surely ? Would have thought a Professional football club and its tax liability during normal times would get much swifter attention from HMRC than a small limited company or sole trader. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gringo Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 42 minutes ago, hintonsboots said: It would depend on the size of the business surely ? Would have thought a Professional football club and its tax liability during normal times would get much swifter attention from HMRC than a small limited company or sole trader. it was not a small limited company Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBRammette Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 1 hour ago, Charlotte Ram said: My UK business wrote to HMRC on the 6th June this year about a very important and specific issue which 2 years ago would have been answered by return, it is now some 8 weeks later and no reply. I understand a lot of the staff at HMRC are working from home, this may explain not getting a formal response from them to show the EFL. They are or reassigned to furlough/furlough fraud but if you want to give them money they are generally proactive! What formal response are we waiting for? RAM1966 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAM1966 Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 (edited) 5 hours ago, Charlotte Ram said: My UK business wrote to HMRC on the 6th June this year about a very important and specific issue which 2 years ago would have been answered by return, it is now some 8 weeks later and no reply. I understand a lot of the staff at HMRC are working from home, this may explain not getting a formal response from them to show the EFL. 2 points: Firstly - A BACS transfer showing that monies had been credited to HMRC should be enough for the EFL to lift sanctions. No need to worry about Debbie on ebay or hanging her washing out!!!!! Secondly - Its not DCFC fault that civil servants have bee once again about as efficient as an ashtray on a motorbike.......... Before any civil servant gives me grief about how hard they work, think about the other 3 lazy tossers that don't in you office!!!!!!!! Take those rose tinted specs off, the bill hasn't been paid 'yet' come on Mel when will it be paid? Maybe that will be anser in the forum later today? Don;t hold your breath past is sitting with our accountant who could be on holiday, I rang him 3 weeks ago, but, I;ve been too busy to chase him up!!!! Edited August 3, 2021 by RAM1966 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAM1966 Posted August 3, 2021 Share Posted August 3, 2021 4 hours ago, Charlotte Ram said: it was not a small limited company No its not, what i would say though as I run my own company, I could evidence when a payment to HMRC has been made. So I think you are clutching at straws............. Pass our regards on to Mel though when you see him tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheron85 Posted August 4, 2021 Share Posted August 4, 2021 7 hours ago, RAM1966 said: Firstly - A BACS transfer showing that monies had been credited to HMRC should be enough for the EFL to lift sanctions. No need to worry about Debbie on ebay or hanging her washing out!!!!! That's an assumption - you have no idea what the EFL will or won't accept RoyMac5 and Reggie Greenwood 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hintonsboots Posted August 4, 2021 Share Posted August 4, 2021 21 hours ago, Curtains said: No point In meeting if NDA signed lol ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now