RoyMac5 Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 48 hours, Carl Sagan and IslandExile 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 48 hours and IslandExile 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footymum2017 Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 1 hour ago, IslandExile said: Out of the Directorship will remove any penalties following administration. Wassall and Lyons, if they weren't previously, are now the two most important people at the club. God help us then ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footymum2017 Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 1 hour ago, RoyMac5 said: Difficult to know unless he's married to @Footymum2017?! ? Perhaps Wass just wanted out of the directorship? I can confirm that isn’t the case! I would think that Wassall will have been looking around as he won’t be able to run the Academy his own way once somebody else is in charge of the club. MM gave him free rein to do what he wanted. Carl Sagan and RoyMac5 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IslandExile Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 10 minutes ago, Footymum2017 said: God help us then ? Is that related to your personal situation - were either responsible for rejecting your child? Or do you just mean it's dire straits anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footymum2017 Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 7 minutes ago, IslandExile said: Is that related to your personal situation - were either responsible for rejecting your child? Or do you just mean it's dire straits anyway? An academy manager should never be the most important person at a football club. Carl Sagan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IslandExile Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 6 minutes ago, Footymum2017 said: An academy manager should never be the most important person at a football club. Agreed. But a club should not be in administration, facing a massive points deduction and a 2 year transfer embargo. Carl Sagan and RoyMac5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crewton Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 8 hours ago, IslandExile said: Out of the Directorship will remove any penalties following administration. Wassall and Lyons, if they weren't previously, are now the two most important people at the club. Not necessarily - they go back three years - but in reality, operational directors aren't going to get a hard time. IslandExile 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Trav Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 I always liked Darren. Proper sound bloke Gap tooth ram, angieram and Bald Eagle's Barmy Army 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angieram Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Big Trav said: I always liked Darren. Proper sound bloke Me too, always has plenty of time for the supporters. Though he does swear a lot on the touchline! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 Carl Sagan and angieram 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 TomG 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foreveram Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 4 hours ago, angieram said: Me too, always has plenty of time for the supporters. Though he does swear a lot on the touchline! ? That’s what you get from watching Derby for years ? 48 hours 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raich Carter Posted September 20, 2021 Share Posted September 20, 2021 On 18/09/2021 at 14:23, IslandExile said: Out of the Directorship will remove any penalties following administration. What do you mean bud? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IslandExile Posted September 20, 2021 Share Posted September 20, 2021 8 minutes ago, Raich Carter said: What do you mean bud? It was my understanding that directors of failed companies can be disqualified from holding similar positions again for a period of time. However, someone has already said that wouldn't apply in Wassall's case because he was an 'operational director'. TBH I don't know what I'm talking about. I'm just fearful of us losing academy staff and products. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crewton Posted September 20, 2021 Share Posted September 20, 2021 26 minutes ago, IslandExile said: It was my understanding that directors of failed companies can be disqualified from holding similar positions again for a period of time. However, someone has already said that wouldn't apply in Wassall's case because he was an 'operational director'. TBH I don't know what I'm talking about. I'm just fearful of us losing academy staff and products. Might be referring to my post. I said that Wassall was unlikely to be subject to any regulatory investigation since he's only a director of the Academy and I presume has no say in how the football club is run. IslandExile 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raich Carter Posted September 20, 2021 Share Posted September 20, 2021 50 minutes ago, IslandExile said: It was my understanding that directors of failed companies can be disqualified from holding similar positions again for a period of time. However, someone has already said that wouldn't apply in Wassall's case because he was an 'operational director'. TBH I don't know what I'm talking about. I'm just fearful of us losing academy staff and products. LOL! Fair enough! And I agree - given the focus and investment, it would be crazy to lose any of the benefits. Regardless of his job title (i.e. Operational Director, cleaner or CEO), if he's a director of the company then he's legally responsible for the affairs of the company - i.e. that he should act in the best interests of the company. So, if he was aware that the company was doing anything illegal, then the Limited Liability aspect is irrelevant and he could be personally liable for the actions of the company. However, if he does act correctly (as I'm sure he would), then his own personal liability is Limited - hence the term Limited (Liability) Company. In essence, the Company exists to limit ones personal exposure to risk - as long as you don't break the law. It works quite well. So it wouldn't be an issue for Dazza at all that they went into administration as long as he wasn't aware they were trading insolvent or equally dodgy stuff. The fact we've gone into administration rather than stop paying staff and players, etc actually suggests the directors are doing the right thing so it could be that Dazza resigned because he's moving on, wants no part of it or just because there's no point in him being a director as it'll all being sold off. In short, lots of reasons why he might resign. IslandExile 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted September 20, 2021 Share Posted September 20, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted September 20, 2021 Share Posted September 20, 2021 A very strong side tonight RoyMac5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted September 20, 2021 Share Posted September 20, 2021 Allsop McDonald Bardell JBrown Cashin Williams CDixon LThompson Aghatise Stretton Cybulski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.f900b682ba972574c6b286e14569685f.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now