Angry Ram Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 (edited) Statement on the EFL website now https://www.efl.com/news/2021/may/efl-statement-Derby-county/ Edited May 11, 2021 by Angry Ram IslandExile 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 Just now, G STAR RAM said: Does seem odd that every time they challenge a ruling by an independent panel that the next independent panel always seem to overturn the ruling of the first. It would appear that it may actually be better to lose the first case because this can be appealed, but if you lose the second case you cant. Makes no sense whatsoever. Mate the identity of the people on the panels need to be published Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 12 minutes ago, Animal is a Ram said: we can breath again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inter politics Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 Pathetic Gibson Abu Derby and Deej 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal is a Ram Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 (edited) Quote The panel concluded that the Disciplinary Commission was wrong to dismiss the League’s expert accountancy evidence, which demonstrated that the Club’s policy regarding the amortisation of player registrations was contrary to standard accounting rules. More specifically, the panel determined that the Club’s policy was not in accordance with accounting standard FRS102 because it failed to accurately reflect the manner in which the Club takes the benefit of player registrations over the lifetime of a player’s contract. So that Professor Pope, was 'right', even though the original report made him sound completely stupid. Edited May 11, 2021 by Animal is a Ram IslandExile 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JfR Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kennington Ram Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 Before we get the statement, as it won't change either way. * Mel has done what other clubs have, just to the extreme. I wish he hadn't, but the EFL needs to take a long, hard look at why it took four years to get a grip on it, and the incentives for doing so. * Retrospectively changing their advice and interpretation of the rules is deeply, deeply wrong. * Rick Parry said something inane about clubs should use the pandemic to reset their business model a few months back, which was something so dumb as to surely prove conclusively he was unfit to be in the role altogether. Steve How Hard?, Deej and Hector was the best 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 Just now, nottingram said: Hopefully there’ll be a follow up statement in words that I can understand guilty on one charge, back to the disciplinary committee to decide on penalty if any nottingram, The Scarlet Pimpernel and Hector was the best 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuffLuff Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 11 minutes ago, Curtains said: The EFL are on a sticky wicket here. They want to be very careful. This panel that panel are they all independent. I did ponder this last night, any punishment has to suit all parties involved or else it’ll drag on further. The other interesting aspect is, if the EFL punish with a points deduction for next season then that could trigger legal action from Wycombe. No clue on the outcome, but the EFL could make themselves more mess than what it’s worth Hector was the best and Curtains 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 3 minutes ago, Animal is a Ram said: So the "EFL win" is simply that the Disciplinary Commission need to reconsider Professor Pope's evidence? Have I understood that correctly? 24Charlie, The Scarlet Pimpernel, Carnero and 3 others 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdinRam Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 1 minute ago, inter politics said: Pathetic Gibson You are blaming the wrong bloke, there's only one person to blame here and it isn't steve nobson The Scarlet Pimpernel, Foreveram and Turnstile 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duncanjwitham Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 Just now, Ghost of Clough said: So the "EFL win" is simply that the Disciplinary Commission need to reconsider Professor Pope's evidence? Have I understood that correctly? That's the way it reads to me. The panel could easily accept his evidence and still rule in our favour. Ghost of Clough and Ken Tram 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anag Ram Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 Take the fine. We've got loadsamoney! ... somewhere ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inter politics Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 1 minute ago, EdinRam said: You are blaming the wrong bloke, there's only one person to blame here and it isn't steve nobson I'm not blaming him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 4 minutes ago, Angry Ram said: Statement on the EFL website now https://www.efl.com/news/2021/may/efl-statement-Derby-county/ "More specifically, the panel determined that the Club’s policy was not in accordance with accounting standard FRS102 because it failed to accurately reflect the manner in which the Club takes the benefit of player registrations over the lifetime of a player’s contract." I think this is in relation to particular 4, where the Disciplinary Commision stated unreliability in predicting future values isn't against FRS 102. Interesting. RadioactiveWaste and Angry Ram 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 Well, that's that. We wait to see what the punishment will be... Thanks again, Mel. Top work! Angry Ram, mike93rh, EdinRam and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralRam Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 Am I right in thinking this is no where near as bad as was being reported the last couple of days? Carnero, Hector was the best, Ken Tram and 9 others 11 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 1 minute ago, Ghost of Clough said: So the "EFL win" is simply that the Disciplinary Commission need to reconsider Professor Pope's evidence? Have I understood that correctly? certainly the EFL wording is more strident than the club's. it would be helpful to know which of the 5 subcharges in charge 2 have been upheld. I think they are asked to consider the penalty now Pope's views have been successfully appealed Death by a 1000 cuts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 3 minutes ago, duncanjwitham said: That's the way it reads to me. The panel could easily accept his evidence and still rule in our favour. no we are guilty, end of. Their job is to decide on the penalty based on pleadings made by the club. Then I guess that can be appealed also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 1 minute ago, GeneralRam said: Am I right in thinking this is no where near as bad as was being reported the last couple of days? We will let you know in 6 months when the DC have made their next decision Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now