Jump to content

Leeds United Premier League Adventures


David

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 940
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Most active in this topic

41 minutes ago, Malagaram said:

Just shows your knowledge of the game,fancy a bet,I will wager whatever amount that you want,my bet would be that Leeds stay up.

They will finish top 10 if Bielsa sees the season out.  Good footballing team with a tremendous work ethic. The man has turned Ayling and Dallas in to fantastic footballers. Who would have thought.

p.s. I would avoid betting with Dodgy Dave if I was you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Ghost of Clough said:

Bamford's turned from one of the most wasteful 'top' CFs in the Championship (8.9 shots per goal) to one of the most lethal in the Prem (3.8 shots per goal). Quite remarkable to be honest.

Proof that the Premier League's a tinpot league and its top strikers wouldn't hack it in the Championship

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Ghost of Clough said:

Bamford's turned from one of the most wasteful 'top' CFs in the Championship (8.9 shots per goal) to one of the most lethal in the Prem (3.8 shots per goal). Quite remarkable to be honest.

Still a Bamford playing for the Dirties though.

That is his crime - and his punishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way to deal with this is just accept that these are not a real Leeds team.

They play great football, don't cheat much and don't even have many bamfords in the team.

Enjoy it as an underdog punching above their weight and upsetting some established teams. And in 1 or 2 years; really enjoy them dropping down again and reverting to type.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/10/2020 at 00:34, Ghost of Clough said:

Bamford's turned from one of the most wasteful 'top' CFs in the Championship (8.9 shots per goal) to one of the most lethal in the Prem (3.8 shots per goal). Quite remarkable to be honest.

This is where stats like xG are actually useful and aren't absolute rubbish like people say. He underperformed massively on xG last season but it showed he was getting into the positions and having goal scoring chances which he either missed or were saved. Now, he's regressing towards the mean and getting goals he did deserve in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Jubbs said:

This is where stats like xG are actually useful and aren't absolute rubbish like people say. He underperformed massively on xG last season but it showed he was getting into the positions and having goal scoring chances which he either missed or were saved. Now, he's regressing towards the mean and getting goals he did deserve in the first place.

He's a striker. How did he 'deserve' those goals last year if he was hitting them wide or at the keeper?

You don't deserve a goal for simply standing in a good position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, td_evans said:

You don't deserve a goal for simply standing in a good position.

Getting into good positions and into good shooting positions is vital to getting goals unless you're an elite finisher. Bamford does this and gets into good positions. Getting into these positions means you're more likely to get more goals, like he is doing now.

Last season, his xG had him down as around an expected 25 goals, he got 16. He's now regressing towards the mean and getting his goals he deserved in the first place.

Edited by Jubbs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Jubbs said:

Getting into good positions and into good shooting positions is vital to getting goals unless you're an elite finisher. Bamford does this and gets into good positions. Getting into these positions means you're more likely to get more goals, like he is doing now.

Last season, his xG had him down as around an expected 25 goals, he got 16. He's now regressing towards the mean and getting his goals he should have got in the first place.

FTFY. Deserved is possibly not the right word. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jubbs said:

This is where stats like xG are actually useful and aren't absolute rubbish like people say. He underperformed massively on xG last season but it showed he was getting into the positions and having goal scoring chances which he either missed or were saved. Now, he's regressing towards the mean and getting goals he did deserve in the first place.

xG doesn't take into account the player taking the shot. Bamford's strike rate had been decreasing year upon year, so . I don't think you can put that all down to "regressing towards the mean"

16/17 = 6 shots per goal
17/18 = 6.5 shots per goal
18/19 = 7.6 shots per goal
19/20 = 8.9 shots per goal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...