RamNut Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 The decision to step away from being senior royals. Good decision. Chose your own life. Step away from this anachronistic institution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 Does that mean the state can repossess their palaces/country residence? If they're not keeping up their schedule of appearances like.....? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Ram Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 Their choice and we are best rid of these self righteous SJWs. Bugger off, don’t come back and we cut the purse strings. Feel sorry for his brother tbf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyinLiverpool Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 2 hours ago, Van der MoodHoover said: Does that mean the state can repossess their palaces/country residence? If they're not keeping up their schedule of appearances like.....? We already own those palaces Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubbles Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 Want my money back for the wedding us taxpayers paid for then. Maybe controversial but I don't like her. Especially with how since they got married Harry has been slowly disconnected from his family. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GboroRam Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 Press: Harry and Megan, off you duck. Harry and Megan duck off. Press: where do you think you're going? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BriggRam Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 5 minutes ago, Squid said: Want my money back for the wedding us taxpayers paid for then. Maybe controversial but I don't like her. Especially with how since they got married Harry has been slowly disconnected from his family. He does have a dodgy uncle she probably wants no connection with Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkFruitsRam7 Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 8 minutes ago, Squid said: Want my money back for the wedding us taxpayers paid for then. Maybe controversial but I don't like her. Especially with how since they got married Harry has been slowly disconnected from his family. a) If Martyn Waghorn, or any other player, cancelled his Derby contract today, he wouldn't have to pay back any of the money he's earned since he's signed. b) I don't blame him from disconnecting from that toxic family. They're more concerned about Harry not wanting to be a senior royal than they are about an alleged paedophile in their ranks ffs. People go on about his brother, but if the rumours about William's commitment to his marriage are to be believed, then I don't blame him for going cold on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nottingram Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 Good on them. People being protective over the Royal Family is something I’ve never really understood. Usually the same people who hate those who claim welfare perversely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 I can see why people like and dislike the Royals I can't see how anyone can think the way our media lay into them (or anyone else) is anything like human. I know feck all about Meghan but I know she doesn't deserve to have poo written about her by parasites like The Sun and Co. Scum of the earth. Even tv news is like "yeah it's because of the media a bit but mostly it's somebody else's fault" No, it's you. It's definitely the media Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stive Pesley Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 Good quote: "Like many other Millennials, Harry is more socially liberal than his elders ... (Also like many other Millennials, he was only able to afford a house thanks to money he got from his parents.)" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anag Ram Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 Beginning of the end for the monarchy. Ageing Queen, unpopular son, Harry in a sulk. Just William left and it probably won't be long before the Press rattle his cage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BriggRam Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 Megxit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 1 hour ago, DarkFruitsRam7 said: a) If Martyn Waghorn, or any other player, cancelled his Derby contract today, he wouldn't have to pay back any of the money he's earned since he's signed. b) I don't blame him from disconnecting from that toxic family. They're more concerned about Harry not wanting to be a senior royal than they are about an alleged paedophile in their ranks ffs. People go on about his brother, but if the rumours about William's commitment to his marriage are to be believed, then I don't blame him for going cold on him. Who is an alleged paedophile? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkFruitsRam7 Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 13 minutes ago, G STAR RAM said: Who is an alleged paedophile? https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/prince-andrew-and-jeffrey-epstein-documentary_uk_5dad9103e4b08cfcc31ecdbd 'In a legal declaration sworn on 5 February 2015 she wrote: “The third time I had sex with Andy was in an orgy on Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands. I was around 18 at the time. Epstein, Andy, approximately eight other girls, and I had sex together. The other girls all seemed and appeared to be under the age of 18 and didn’t really speak English. Epstein laughed about the fact they couldn’t really communicate, saying that they are the “easiest” girls to get along with.”' That's an allegation of paedophilia. Regardless, there's stronger evidence to suggest that he utilised his mate's sex trafficking ring, whatever the age of the girls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 35 minutes ago, DarkFruitsRam7 said: https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/prince-andrew-and-jeffrey-epstein-documentary_uk_5dad9103e4b08cfcc31ecdbd 'In a legal declaration sworn on 5 February 2015 she wrote: “The third time I had sex with Andy was in an orgy on Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands. I was around 18 at the time. Epstein, Andy, approximately eight other girls, and I had sex together. The other girls all seemed and appeared to be under the age of 18 and didn’t really speak English. Epstein laughed about the fact they couldn’t really communicate, saying that they are the “easiest” girls to get along with.”' That's an allegation of paedophilia. Regardless, there's stronger evidence to suggest that he utilised his mate's sex trafficking ring, whatever the age of the girls. If sleeping with someone under the age of 18 is paedophilia I imagine there are quite a lot of paedophiles on here too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilkleyram Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 36 minutes ago, DarkFruitsRam7 said: https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/prince-andrew-and-jeffrey-epstein-documentary_uk_5dad9103e4b08cfcc31ecdbd 'In a legal declaration sworn on 5 February 2015 she wrote: “The third time I had sex with Andy was in an orgy on Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands. I was around 18 at the time. Epstein, Andy, approximately eight other girls, and I had sex together. The other girls all seemed and appeared to be under the age of 18 and didn’t really speak English. Epstein laughed about the fact they couldn’t really communicate, saying that they are the “easiest” girls to get along with.”' That's an allegation of paedophilia. Regardless, there's stronger evidence to suggest that he utilised his mate's sex trafficking ring, whatever the age of the girls. It is an allegation that may or may not be true, but it is not an allegation of paedophilia @DarkFruitsRam7. Paedophilia is a sexual interest in prepubescent children, not girls, or boys, around the age of 18. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkFruitsRam7 Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 5 minutes ago, G STAR RAM said: If sleeping with someone under the age of 18 is paedophilia I imagine there are quite a lot of paedophiles on here too. Apologies, just checked and found out that the age of consent in the US Virgin Islands is 16, not 18. Stating that there are allegations of paedophilia, as far as I'm aware, is wrong. Let me rephrase then: 'They're more concerned about Harry not wanting to be a senior royal than they are about someone in their ranks utilising a sex trafficking ring ffs.' 1 minute ago, ilkleyram said: It is an allegation that may or may not be true, but it is not an allegation of paedophilia @DarkFruitsRam7. Paedophilia is a sexual interest in prepubescent children, not girls, or boys, around the age of 18. Fair enough. The allegation would be of child sexual abuse then, though see above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red_Dawn Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 3 hours ago, DarkFruitsRam7 said: a) If Martyn Waghorn, or any other player, cancelled his Derby contract today, he wouldn't have to pay back any of the money he's earned since he's signed. b) I don't blame him from disconnecting from that toxic family. They're more concerned about Harry not wanting to be a senior royal than they are about an alleged paedophile in their ranks ffs. People go on about his brother, but if the rumours about William's commitment to his marriage are to be believed, then I don't blame him for going cold on him. Yep. My thoughts too. If you leave your employment, you don't get to keep the company car. If they truly want to leave as royals and become "financially independant", then they absolutely shouldn't have that fancy cottage the public paid for, or money from the royal purse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkFruitsRam7 Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 1 minute ago, Red_Dawn said: Yep. My thoughts too. If you leave your employment, you don't get to keep the company car. If they truly want to leave as royals and become "financially independant", then they absolutely shouldn't have that fancy cottage the public paid for, or money from the royal purse. I think you misunderstood the first part of my post. My point was on salary, but yours is valid on any extras received in the course of employment. I’m always going to be biased against the Royal Family though and will support those who want out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.