ossieram Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 5 minutes ago, Seaside Ram said: How Huddz has got a new deal and Johnno hasn't is criminal. Toms was triggered by the amount of games played last season and a clause in his contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRam Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 2 hours ago, Seaside Ram said: How Huddz has got a new deal and Johnno hasn't is criminal. Johnson's been offered one, it just looks like he seems to be choosing to move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 Gone. Bye Brad. https://www.dcfc.co.uk/news/2019/07/johnson-departs-for-blackburn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodley Ram Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 Would have liked him to stay but thanks BJ wish you well.....bar 2 games of course ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 Good luck to him, good servant to the club, fee wasn't his fault. Had ups and downs here but always came across as a very likeable person in interviews and I'd never say he wasn't putting in the effort. once a Ram, always a citeh. I'll bite to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irobinson Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 Never that comfortable people calling a bloke BJ ta ra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestro Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 This topic didn't age well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Git Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 Good luck at Blackburn Athletic Bradley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 1 hour ago, mastah said: This topic didn't age well... Just needs a tweak..... Johnson in talks over a new deal......at Blackburn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRam Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 2 hours ago, irobinson said: Never that comfortable people calling a bloke BJ ta ra It's good to be open about your insecurities ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philmycock Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 Never really got the impression he ever wanted to be at DCFC, had some good games and some awful games, meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibby Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 Joined Blackburn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TZM Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 I’m guessing the big FFP write-off will be covered by Lampard and team going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 Just now, TZM said: I’m guessing the big FFP write-off will be covered by Lampard and team going. but don't we need that money to buy players? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRam Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 Perhaps FFP is mad enough that a "Free Transfer" doesn't have the same impact as "Releasing" a player. FFP has seemed convoluted enough in my previous attempts to understand it for that to be a thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TZM Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Spanish said: but don't we need that money to buy players? I don’t think the money makes much difference to our accounts. As far as I’m aware, we treat the amortisation of transfer fees in a very strange manner. We basically leave players with a large value at the end of their contracts, instead of writing-off the full amount over the same period. This is fine if we sell the player. The problems arise when someone runs down their contract and they get released, or move on. We have to take a big hit all in one go. I have no idea how we’re allowed to do it, because it goes against accounting rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 We don't know what the residual values are set at. could be losing @£1m ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 6 minutes ago, TZM said: I don’t think the money makes much difference to our accounts. As far as I’m aware, we treat the amortisation of transfer fees in a very strange manner. We basically leave players with a large value at the end of their contracts, instead of writing-off the full amount over the same period. This is fine if we sell the player. The problems arise when someone runs down their contract and they get released, or move on. We have to take a big hit all in one go. I have no idea how we’re allowed to do it, because it goes against accounting rules. yep I know that . All I was saying was that if Frank's money is going towards balancing off the loss then that is not good news. I'm hoping that they adjusted the carrying values last year using the stadium sale. I also hope they've reconsidered their approach to amortisation so that FL's money can be used accordingly. Generally I don't disagree with their approach unless it is just a way of 'kicking the can down the road' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 10 minutes ago, RamNut said: We don't know what the residual values are set at. could be losing @£1m ? i you can work this out against specific players well good luck. Just think the increase can be attributed to a couple of players but probably not their full value. Thanks to SwissRamble for the stellar work #DCFC player amortisation rose £1.6m (31%) to £6.6m, reflecting recent increase in transfer spend. Since 2016 Derby have considered residual values in amortisation calculation, which reduces this annual charge. This is a valid accounting treatment, but rare in world of football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TZM Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 4 minutes ago, Spanish said: yep I know that . All I was saying was that if Frank's money is going towards balancing off the loss then that is not good news. I'm hoping that they adjusted the carrying values last year using the stadium sale. I also hope they've reconsidered their approach to amortisation so that FL's money can be used accordingly. Generally I don't disagree with their approach unless it is just a way of 'kicking the can down the road' 11 minutes ago, RamNut said: We don't know what the residual values are set at. could be losing @£1m ? I hope so. You’d hope that the majority of players would have most of their value wiped off before they reach the final year of their contract. It would only be young players or very talented players that you’d have any chance of seeing a fee for, from after that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.