Sith Happens Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 Its been announced next year we get a day off to celebrate ve day, Friday the 8th may. The catch? We lose may day bank holiday Monday Its pathetic, why not push the boat out and just have an extra day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 3 minutes ago, Paul71 said: Its been announced next year we get a day off to celebrate ve day, Friday the 8th may. The catch? We lose may day bank holiday Monday Its pathetic, why not push the boat out and just have an extra day? Maybe it’s because employers might moan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anon Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 We don't need any more bank holidays. If we have too many we'll end up like the French, who work about 20 days/year and strike on 19 of those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sith Happens Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 Other countries manage, even others within the uk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1of4 Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 Make the Tories happy that the bank holiday is moved away from May Day, far to many connotations with communism for their liking. It as been moved before, when the 50th anniversary of VE day was celebrated. But unlike next year when it will be moved to a Friday, it was changed from one Monday to another back in 1995. Coincidently the previous change also happen during a Conservative government. Bet there'll be a call by some Tory MPs to make the change permanent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highgate Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 3 hours ago, Anon said: We don't need any more bank holidays. If we have too many we'll end up like the French, who work about 20 days/year and strike on 19 of those. Sounds good to me. Vive la France ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ariotofmyown Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 All this war memorial stuff is so much more exaggerated than when I were a lad. It's like our lives are so empty we have to show off about how deeply we remember the fallen. As long as we only know about what happened with Britain though, that is fine. And as long as we forget all the lessons too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 I thought that VE Day was supposed to be March 31st, but then they moved it to June 30th and then to October 31st. I wish they would make their minds up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GboroRam Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 14 hours ago, Paul71 said: Its been announced next year we get a day off to celebrate ve day, Friday the 8th may. The catch? We lose may day bank holiday Monday Its pathetic, why not push the boat out and just have an extra day? Of all the bank holidays to try to lose, they aim for the one based on workers rights. What a surprise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stive Pesley Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 Do we get another one in August to celebrate VJ day? The *actual* end of the war Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRamFan Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 13 minutes ago, StivePesley said: Do we get another one in August to celebrate VJ day? The *actual* end of the war Beat me to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 50 minutes ago, StivePesley said: Do we get another one in August to celebrate VJ day? The *actual* end of the war Hmmm, not aure about that one. Obviously there were millions of civilian casualties all over the world in WW2 but comemmorating a VJ day which only came about due to tens of thousands of japanese people being vaporised just feels a bit wrong to me. I accept that might just be me, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stive Pesley Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 Just now, Wolfie said: Hmmm, not aure about that one. Obviously there were millions of civilian casualties all over the world in WW2 but comemmorating a VJ day which only came about due to tens of thousands of japanese people being vaporised just feels a bit wrong to me. I accept that might just be me, though. Yeah - I was being flippant really. But it does kind of feel wrong that we will be celebrating VE day as the end of the war, ignoring the fact that 3 months later we (Allied forces) dropped 2 atomic bombs on Japan. I just hope that those anniversaries are given the gravitas they deserve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilkleyram Posted June 11, 2019 Share Posted June 11, 2019 23 hours ago, Wolfie said: Hmmm, not aure about that one. Obviously there were millions of civilian casualties all over the world in WW2 but comemmorating a VJ day which only came about due to tens of thousands of japanese people being vaporised just feels a bit wrong to me. I accept that might just be me, though. If it weren't for the atomic bombs ending the war with Japan then I, and I suspect many millions of others, wouldn't be around now. My Dad was preparing for an amphibious assault on islands occupied by the Japanese in the Pacific when the bombs dropped and Japan surrendered. When they eventually arrived on the islands they discovered that the Japanese had been entirely untouched by the naval shelling and airstrikes that were meant to make their landings possible - the crossfire they would have faced would have made the D-Day landings look like a picnic (and they weren't). My dad would almost inevitably have been killed along with many thousands of others, and I always raise a quiet glass to him and those that ended that part of the war on VJ day. You can also argue that the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs had one other very beneficial effect (other than my Dad) and that was to help to prevent both the USA (and France and Britain) and the USSR from actually using atomic weapons during the Cold War. They knew, because they saw what happened in Japan and because they knew that the weapons they later developed were many times more powerful, the catastrophic damage to mankind that would result. There were hawks on both sides, but both sides had their voices of reason too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gee SCREAMER !! Posted June 11, 2019 Share Posted June 11, 2019 34 minutes ago, ilkleyram said: If it weren't for the atomic bombs ending the war with Japan then I, and I suspect many millions of others, wouldn't be around now. My Dad was preparing for an amphibious assault on islands occupied by the Japanese in the Pacific when the bombs dropped and Japan surrendered. When they eventually arrived on the islands they discovered that the Japanese had been entirely untouched by the naval shelling and airstrikes that were meant to make their landings possible - the crossfire they would have faced would have made the D-Day landings look like a picnic (and they weren't). My dad would almost inevitably have been killed along with many thousands of others, and I always raise a quiet glass to him and those that ended that part of the war on VJ day. You can also argue that the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs had one other very beneficial effect (other than my Dad) and that was to help to prevent both the USA (and France and Britain) and the USSR from actually using atomic weapons during the Cold War. They knew, because they saw what happened in Japan and because they knew that the weapons they later developed were many times more powerful, the catastrophic damage to mankind that would result. There were hawks on both sides, but both sides had their voices of reason too. Read an excellent book about the Hiroshima bomb year's ago called Ruin from the Air. Well worth a go . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jono Posted June 11, 2019 Share Posted June 11, 2019 On 10/06/2019 at 00:36, 1of4 said: Make the Tories happy that the bank holiday is moved away from May Day, far to many connotations with communism for their liking. It as been moved before, when the 50th anniversary of VE day was celebrated. But unlike next year when it will be moved to a Friday, it was changed from one Monday to another back in 1995. Coincidently the previous change also happen during a Conservative government. Bet there'll be a call by some Tory MPs to make the change permanent. Oh, and there was me thinking Mayday was all about dancing around a pole and pagan fertility rites Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sith Happens Posted June 11, 2019 Share Posted June 11, 2019 53 minutes ago, jono said: Oh, and there was me thinking Mayday was all about dancing around a pole and pagan fertility rites Even better, a bank holiday to celebrate pole dancing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jono Posted June 11, 2019 Share Posted June 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Paul71 said: Even better, a bank holiday to celebrate pole dancing. The thought had crossed my mind ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ariotofmyown Posted June 12, 2019 Share Posted June 12, 2019 On 10/06/2019 at 10:24, GboroRam said: Of all the bank holidays to try to lose, they aim for the one based on workers rights. What a surprise. True, but it is clearly the worst bank holiday. Too soon after Easter and too close to the End of May one. Another in late July when the weather is better would be good. Or maybe end of October to mean we didn't just have one holiday in the 7 months between end of May and Xmas. Why don't politicians just give us more. A real vote winning. Fk business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted June 12, 2019 Share Posted June 12, 2019 42 minutes ago, ariotofmyown said: True, but it is clearly the worst bank holiday. Too soon after Easter and too close to the End of May one. Another in late July when the weather is better would be good. Or maybe end of October to mean we didn't just have one holiday in the 7 months between end of May and Xmas. Why don't politicians just give us more. A real vote winning. Fk business. Labour are still promising the UK's saint's days will be made bank holidays, so that's another one on 23rd April. Stupidly close to Easter & May Day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.