RoyMac5 Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 Another midget! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbo jones Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Andicis said: Assuming we will offload Jerome, Martin and potentially Nuge then if we're still planning to sign Waghorn and Wells. You’d have to think the club expects to be able to move all 3 of those on, may have to be on loan though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuskus Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 Maybe we might stick Marriott or Waghorn in the cam position with mount and the other one up front with wells as back up I’m probably wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnero Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 7 minutes ago, David said: Nope I refuse to believe this and choose instead to latch onto a ridiculous notion that we're making a straight swap with no cash involved whatsoever. Perhaps a little bit of cash from us to Burnley. Nakhi Wells wages to be double those of Vydra. This club sometimes it beggars belief! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperDerbySuperRams Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 For context, Burnley paid 3.5m rising to 5m for Wells. He hasn’t started a game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 I’d rather have Bennett as the third choice striker than Wells, assuming Waghorn is still coming and Jerome, Martin and Nugent are leaving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DcFc Dyycheee Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 We've lost the plot if we're signing both Waghorn and Wells. We don't need another forward. Use the money to strengthen elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 We could always wait to see what the facts are before rushing to judgement. Sorry...as you were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HariboWest Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 We’ve lost our minds. And I love it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Carnero said: Nope I refuse to believe this and choose instead to latch onto a ridiculous notion that we're making a straight swap with no cash involved whatsoever. Perhaps a little bit of cash from us to Burnley. Nakhi Wells wages to be double those of Vydra. This club sometimes it beggars belief! Tbf sky sports are to blame here as they’re the ones who hinted about 25 minutes ago that it’s a straight swap deal with no suggestion of a fee being involved, before later changing their story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doodle Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 Can’t understand this at all. I thought the Waghorn deal was to give strength up top. Wells isn’t that sort of player. We surely can’t be getting both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnero Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 Just now, HariboWest said: We’ve lost our minds. And I love it. I presume you mean some of the posters on this thread? Yes, agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 Could this be a case of Burnley telling us they wont buy Vydra until Wells is gone and this is our workaround to get it moving in time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevin Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 Frank if you are on this board don't listen to everything your uncle Harry says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePrisoner Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 1 minute ago, sage said: We could always wait to see what the facts are before rushing to judgement. Sorry...as you were. Don’t bring that levelheaded approach round here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anon Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, sage said: We could always wait to see what the facts are before rushing to judgement. Sorry...as you were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bald Eagle's Barmy Army Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 I think WellsRAM 99 has a good ring to it, hey @VydraRAM 99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 5 minutes ago, SuperDerbySuperRams said: For context, Burnley paid 3.5m rising to 5m for Wells. He hasn’t started a game. I suspect he wouldn’t for us either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbo jones Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 Seems an odd one, but I’ll wait until something actually happens before losing the plot over it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bald Eagle's Barmy Army Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, Doodle said: Can’t understand this at all. I thought the Waghorn deal was to give strength up top. Wells isn’t that sort of player. We surely can’t be getting both You dont understand anything. You'd moan even if we signed Neymar, Ronaldo and Messi in a swap deal for Blackman and Butterfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.