Rab a dab doo Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 He has returned from the BlueBirds nest to take up his rightful place with all the other Rams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valleyram Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 On 27/05/2018 at 12:16, AndyinLiverpool said: How long before his legs go? How long before the same voices start to decry our midfield for being less than dynamic or lacking creativity? how long before those calling for youthful players to be given a chance? How many people already calling for this are ready to welcome Bryson back with open arms? If u saw his stats for km covered in games his legs are nowhere close to going , having watched derby closely this season Rowett made an arse of it letting him go on loan , if he had stayed derby would have got promoted imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbobram Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 5 minutes ago, valleyram said: If u saw his stats for km covered in games his legs are nowhere close to going , having watched derby closely this season Rowett made an arse of it letting him go on loan , if he had stayed derby would have got promoted imo i'd have loved that but i highly doubt that would have been the case. He's been here for a long time and in every one of those seasons since Mac first took over we've had a better squad than we did this year. I love Brys and want him here next year but he wouldn't have made the difference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramsam Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 7 minutes ago, valleyram said: If u saw his stats for km covered in games his legs are nowhere close to going , having watched derby closely this season Rowett made an arse of it letting him go on loan , if he had stayed derby would have got promoted imo Robbie Savage topped the fitness charts when he was here but it was clear his sharpness had gone. Not saying that Bryson has lost his sharpness as I haven’t seen him play but distance covered is not a good measure of match fitness. Be interesting to see how hungry he still is having had a lucrative contract and being a bit part player for a while now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 17 minutes ago, jimbobram said: i'd have loved that but i highly doubt that would have been the case. He's been here for a long time and in every one of those seasons since Mac first took over we've had a better squad than we did this year. I love Brys and want him here next year but he wouldn't have made the difference Certainly not in a team where the ball sails 30 ft over the midfields heads into space for jerome and weimann to go scampering after. We didn't really have hold up play up front. And bryso would have found that if he made a late run into the box, that vydra would have been in his way ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 10 minutes ago, Ramsam said: Be interesting to see how hungry he still is having had a lucrative contract and being a bit part player for a while now. I imagine getting promoted has probably sated his hunger... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodley Ram Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 Do you not think that allowing Bryson and others go on loan was not just about football and squad size but mainly about the wage bill and trying to reduce it. i get the feeling that Rowett didn’t want Bryson to go but needed to try and balance the books Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 1 hour ago, Woodley Ram said: Do you not think that allowing Bryson and others go on loan was not just about football and squad size but mainly about the wage bill and trying to reduce it. i get the feeling that Rowett didn’t want Bryson to go but needed to try and balance the books I think you are correct but he left himself dreadfully short in midfield when he let all of those go from central midfield and again he repeated it when he let Russell leave and replaced him with no one ( Palmer was never there to replace Russell) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth's left foot Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 Bryson, Martin and Thorne reunited ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Gnarly Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 36 minutes ago, Seth's left foot said: Bryson, Martin and Thorne reunited ? Yeah at QPR when Mac gets them in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 3 hours ago, Woodley Ram said: Do you not think that allowing Bryson and others go on loan was not just about football and squad size but mainly about the wage bill and trying to reduce it. i get the feeling that Rowett didn’t want Bryson to go but needed to try and balance the books I may be wrong on timing but didn't he bring Ledley in AFTER Bryson was released - if that's right then how would that have been "balancing the books"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbobram Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 4 minutes ago, HantsRam said: I may be wrong on timing but didn't he bring Ledley in AFTER Bryson was released - if that's right then how would that have been "balancing the books"? correct. Ledley was after the transfer window as he was a free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 7 minutes ago, HantsRam said: I may be wrong on timing but didn't he bring Ledley in AFTER Bryson was released - if that's right then how would that have been "balancing the books"? Rowett had to loan Bryson to be able to afford to buy Kieftenbeld for £300k late on deadline day. WE thought it had all gone through but Kieftenbeld didn't sign the form in the right place. Rowett said he didn't really want to let Bryson go but needed a specific type of player. As we were then a midfielder short we were able to sign Ledley after the transfer window as he was a free agent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnero Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 1 minute ago, sage said: Rowett had to loan Bryson to be able to afford to buy Kieftenbeld for £300k late on deadline day. WE thought it had all gone through but Kieftenbeld didn't sign the form in the right place. Rowett said he didn't really want to let Bryson go but needed a specific type of player. As we were then a midfielder short we were able to sign Ledley after the transfer window as he was a free agent. Indeed, but the original point remains that it was his choice to get rid of Bryson (as he wanted Kieftenbeld). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 Just now, Carnero said: Indeed, but the original point remains that it was his choice to get rid of Bryson (as he wanted Kieftenbeld). He needed a specific type of player 9energetic DCM) for his formation but couldn't afford him. If he could afford him he wouldn't have let Bryson go on loan. Cardiff wanted him and we thought we were able to improve the team with Kietenbeld. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 5 minutes ago, sage said: Rowett had to loan Bryson to be able to afford to buy Kieftenbeld for £300k late on deadline day. WE thought it had all gone through but Kieftenbeld didn't sign the form in the right place. Rowett said he didn't really want to let Bryson go but needed a specific type of player. As we were then a midfielder short we were able to sign Ledley after the transfer window as he was a free agent. Yeah - but the pedant in me was thinking that therefore it was a Rowett choice (ie wanted player type X rather than Bryson) rather than some act of selfless devotion to the financial cause on his part, which was how the phrase "loaned to balance the books" came across. But no biggie......we're all friends again now that Roger the Viper has slithered westwards...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnero Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 12 minutes ago, HantsRam said: we're all friends again for now............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 1 hour ago, Carnero said: for now............. Anyone heard from Curtains recently? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valleyram Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 3 hours ago, Mr Giggles said: Yeah at QPR when Mac gets them in trust me that wont happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodley Ram Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 5 hours ago, HantsRam said: I may be wrong on timing but didn't he bring Ledley in AFTER Bryson was released - if that's right then how would that have been "balancing the books"? Different wages , different players , Ledley was a sort of last minute thing ( I would think) as he was signed after the deadline, although he did go for the Brum player. But my answer would be Bryson would be more expensive... but who knows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.