Jump to content

Richard Keogh.


Oneram66

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, curb said:

 

Playing around with the back four hasn't worked, so you want us to play around with the back four?

 

Five at the back with two defensive midfielders playing virtually as two more center backs, that's seven on the edge of our area instead of our usual six.

Hmm, sounds like a plan.

I'm not saying any of these are set in stone ideas, but perhaps having 5 at the back with attacking minded fullbacks wouldn't be too bad. Maybe we'd see the defensive and offensive sides of the team finally link up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 281
  • Created
  • Last Reply
14 hours ago, RamLad1884 said:

I'm not saying any of these are set in stone ideas, but perhaps having 5 at the back with attacking minded fullbacks wouldn't be too bad. Maybe we'd see the defensive and offensive sides of the team finally link up

We played 532 with Jim Smith in the promotion season IIRC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...