Jump to content

Leicester sack Shakespeare


David

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
18 minutes ago, ViewsFromTheMiddle said:

Maybe Pearson got the job at OH Leuven so he could switch when this happened.

It all seems a bit of a mess.

Shakespeare and Walsh were supposedly the masterminds behind it all, Pearson just hired them hindered them both. 

Ranieri didn't change too much initially but it all went wrong when in 16/17 he started tinkering.

Shakespeare played an XI most similar in style and personnel to the title winning side and they stayed up relatively comfortably. 

Bringing Pearson or Ranieri back would be essentially pointless. They're starting again now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to see stats for caretaker managers who get the job full time and how long they last after that before being sacked.

They always seem to get an initial response as a vast majority of the time the players seem to want them put in place, then they inevitably struggle and get sacked about 3 months later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...