Sir Me Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Translations from the Dutch media: Van den Brom: "Interest is logical Buijs' ADO Den Haag midfielder Danny Buijs may be in the concrete interest of Derby County know. As first Friday night football has managed to report to the English club like the sea with the midfielder. The fact that a delegation of the English Championship club last Friday at the gallery on Sat Buijs surprised coach John van den Brom not. "No wonder you are interested in Danny, now that he plays again," said the trainer talking to Voetbal International. ADO Den Haag Buijs is in possession of a contract expires. Van den Brom takes another blow to the arm, leaving Buijs at home with Derby County to speak. "It's definitely not that we do not want him, but Danny is obviously free to speak with other clubs." Buijs itself does have ears to the move, so he let this site know . The interest from Derby County is not new. Also last season was the club for all practical Buijs. Derby reached its agreement with ADO Den Haag on the lump sum payment for Buijs, but the midfielder himself decided not to accept the offer. "The situation has now changed," he told Buijs to the football first. Buijs backs interest from Derby County ADO midfielder Danny Buijs is in the interest from Derby County. Friday was a delegation from the club for the midfielder in the gallery during ADO Twente. It reports the AD. The match against FC Twente was typically one where Danny Buijs feels comfortable with. High speed, dedication and above all fight. The midfielder was one of the stars against FC Twente and was close to three times a hit. This clearance of the Derby delegation. It is not the first time the English club from the Championship on the screen for the midfielder to take over. Last season it seemed that Buijs in the winter would relocate, but chose at the last minute for a longer stay in The Hague. The transfer fell through last summer off. Nevertheless, Buijs, who has a contract expires, still enamored of the club. "I'm invited once went to see. That was quite an experience. It's a big club with a beautiful stadium. " Derby County back into the market for Danny Buijs 26/04/2011 14:58 One year after the transfer to Derby County ricochets makes Danny Buijs still possible transition. The English club again showed interest. A delegation from Derby County Friday followed the operations of Buijs in the game against FC Twente. The 29-year-old midfielder has a contract expires at ADO Den Haag and can transfer free to switch to the Championship club. "No wonder you are interested in Danny, now that he plays again," says ADO coach John van den Brom in Voetbal International . "It's definitely not that we do not want him, but Danny is obviously free to speak with other clubs." Derby County one year ago was already interested in Buijs. The club had an agreement with ADO about a ransom, but could not agree with the midfielder himself. The one-year contract was insufficient for the change, as judged Buijs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 So in other words now his contract is running out we can afford him. I say this because last time it was personal terms that went wrong. Possibly his wages were too high when taken into conjunction with the fee that would be payable. This time his contract is up, less fee more available for wages etc... On the question of why is Appleby going to watch him? He is chairman and if there were going to be talks with the player/agent/club it would be a sign of strong interest and wanting of the player by DCFC if manager, chief exec and or chairman are there. A professional and respectful way of doing business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uttoxram75 Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Beat me to it Dav. If Appleby is involved then it'll be for wage/fee/agent negotiations. Clough and Metgod already know about the player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Looking at his soccernet page he must have been injured this season, only played 14 games (6 of them starts) but has 2 goals and 2 assists to his name. Could be why the coach quoted in the article above says " no wonder they are interested now he plays again" Perhaps we found the injury in his medical and weren't prepared to pay the wages he wanted for someone who would possibly hardly play. Having read the last article again it seemed we only offered him a 1 year deal - maybe because of the injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Like I've said in another thread, I was looking forward to him last season and we missed out so hope we can get him this season. From what I've heard he sounds like a championship built player, a energetic all action midfield player, he can also play Right Back which we DO need cover for, so hopefully we can get him in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcfcdavecov Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Sounds like we went over with this delegation, not for a scouting purpose otherwise you wouldn't take the Chairman. This has to be for negotiations, and the comments from the player sound good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Sorry misread the stats earlier, it's 14 appearances, 2 goals from 2 shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFC-2010 Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 I have a feeling this guy will be good, could be our Akos Buzsacky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagerbob Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Sorry misread the stats earlier, it's 14 appearances, 2 goals from 2 shots. Only 6 starts though including the other night. 8 were sub appearances. Since Appleby was at the game, how about a cheeky bid for Luuk de Jong of twente. A future Dutch national team star. I know he might cost the earth, and is probably eyeing up a move to a champions league team, but hey ho, get in their first derby! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorksopRam Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Ooooooooh, yes please! I was far too excited about getting him last time, so I'll keep it in restraint this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapeTownRams Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 But I dont ever recall Appleby having been anywhere near negotiations re: a player before - it's always been Glick, that's his role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uttoxram75 Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 Maybe Tom's away on a different negotiation - or just on holiday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StaffsRam Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 Given how well some of the previous negotiations have gone, perhaps it's for the best that GSE are taking Glick out of the firing line..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackNwhites Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Only 6 starts though including the other night. 8 were sub appearances. Since Appleby was at the game, how about a cheeky bid for Luuk de Jong of twente. A future Dutch national team star. I know he might cost the earth, and is probably eyeing up a move to a champions league team, but hey ho, get in their first derby! Ha ha, love that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimacked Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Having more involvment from Appleby has to be a good sign. At least GSE are not leaving Glick and Clough stranded as seems like happened in the past. Moving for players who we showed interest in last year, but could now get in on a free is sensible business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p.shilton Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Very sensible, but business all the same. If he could have made a difference this season then surely spending a few quid earlier on could have been good business too? Finishing higher up the league would have brought in more revenue- penny pinching is not always the best way to proceed. The fact that he didn't get snapped up by anyone else in the meantime suggests that maybe he isn't that good or he is too big of a risk with his injury. I do like the look of him though and trust the judgement of Clough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Very sensible, but business all the same. If he could have made a difference this season then surely spending a few quid earlier on could have been good business too? Finishing higher up the league would have brought in more revenue- penny pinching is not always the best way to proceed. The fact that he didn't get snapped up by anyone else in the meantime suggests that maybe he isn't that good or he is too big of a risk with his injury. I do like the look of him though and trust the judgement of Clough From the translated article it appears that we offered him s year contract and he wanted longer. Maybe he was carrying an injury and longer than a year would have been too risky for us when paying a fee? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duracell Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Player had injury, 2 year contract too much of a gamble, thought we'd leave it a year to see how he got on, no other interest in him as he's been injured most of the season, easybob'syouruncle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StaffsRam Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Agree with the general principle of it being too much of a gamble, but that hasn't stopped us previously with certain players, ie. Hulse, Davies, Anderson etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Agree with the general principle of it being too much of a gamble, but that hasn't stopped us previously with certain players, ie. Hulse, Davies, Anderson etc. Davies got a year extension Based on his attitude, and has stayed fit since his return. Similar to what we offered Buijs Maybe lessons have been learnt. After all no new deal for Hospital. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.