Jump to content

McClaren correct decision - Mel's right


wiseram

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Albert said:

Purely on results, Clement wasn't the case, we need to infer things going on behind the scenes to justify that. 

Clement was having a sticky patch when he got the chop. Non of them were given enough time by our ego maniac of a chairman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The fact that McClaren needed to be immediately removed is an indictment of the decision to appoint him for a second term.  Exactly the same events occurred this time as they did last.  I honestly wouldn't put it past Morris to appoint him again further down the line for a THIRD term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, unclej said:

The fact that McClaren needed to be immediately removed is an indictment of the decision to appoint him for a second term.  Exactly the same events occurred this time as they did last.  I honestly wouldn't put it past Morris to appoint him again further down the line for a THIRD term.

Has he been offered the Newcastle job again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...