AucklandRam Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 11 minutes ago, Albert said: Purely on results, Clement wasn't the case, we need to infer things going on behind the scenes to justify that. Clement was having a sticky patch when he got the chop. Non of them were given enough time by our ego maniac of a chairman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waffle Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 annouce Neymar already Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 Shhh...it watch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unclej Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 The fact that McClaren needed to be immediately removed is an indictment of the decision to appoint him for a second term. Exactly the same events occurred this time as they did last. I honestly wouldn't put it past Morris to appoint him again further down the line for a THIRD term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 3 hours ago, unclej said: The fact that McClaren needed to be immediately removed is an indictment of the decision to appoint him for a second term. Exactly the same events occurred this time as they did last. I honestly wouldn't put it past Morris to appoint him again further down the line for a THIRD term. Has he been offered the Newcastle job again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.