MackworthRamIsGod Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 I'm guessing the January transfer window means nothing these days? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamsPolls Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 minute ago, MackworthRamIsGod said: I'm guessing the January transfer window means nothing these days? The loan agreement between Burnley & Birmingham probably had a clause in it where Brum could purchase him at any point for that fee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEL Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 16 minutes ago, RamsPolls said: The fact that they have only spent £1m on him is ludicrous. A player who is massively inform and wanted my numerous clubs to only go for £1m is shocking. Burnley have had their pants down massively by Birmingham. If us or Fulham had have gone for him, we would have had to pay over £4m. But to be honest, I'm not fussed that he has gone there. Zola won't be taking them anywhere but down. @curtains there you go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 3 minutes ago, Derby_EnglandLoyal said: @curtains there you go. Thanks Interesting but I didn't really want him to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mihangel Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 42 minutes ago, RamsPolls said: The fact that they have only spent £1m on him is ludicrous. A player who is massively inform and wanted my numerous clubs to only go for £1m is shocking. Burnley have had their pants down massively by Birmingham. If us or Fulham had have gone for him, we would have had to pay over £4m. But to be honest, I'm not fussed that he has gone there. Zola won't be taking them anywhere but down. Why ludicrous, he's not very good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamsPolls Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 2 minutes ago, ShoreRam said: Why ludicrous, he's not very good! For a player that has scored 7 goals in 16 games. That's a very good fee for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mihangel Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 11 minutes ago, RamsPolls said: For a player that has scored 7 goals in 16 games. That's a very good fee for him. That's this season and is good, but you could look at the fact he's scored 25 goals in the last 5 years. Not far off what Martin was averaging per season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 They've done well with that. As for transfer window....i guess the deal can be agreed before but can't be official until Jan 1st, which won't affect players already on loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsene Titman Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 It's actually 6 in 17 games and, career to date, 59 goals in 273 games including 0 in 32 for Burnley. Not great and we need better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metalsheep02 Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Quick pr win for owners after sacking Rowett last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kernow Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Clubs can agree to sign any player at any point of the season. The player would not officially become a permanent player of that club until the start of the next window though. Seeing as Juktiewicz is already on loan there, he will officially be a permanent Birmingham player on Jan 1st. Fulham could do the same with Martin at any time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal is a Ram Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Jan 3rd - as 1st is a Sunday and 2nd is a Bank Holiday. #pedantic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 hour ago, Kernow said: Fulham could do the same with Martin at any time. Yet have declined to do so....... <stirs pot> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kernow Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 55 minutes ago, RadioactiveWaste said: Yet have declined to do so....... <stirs pot> That's why I chucked that in there They have also been linked to other strikers similar to Martin, why would they want both I wonder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraser_23 Posted December 27, 2016 Share Posted December 27, 2016 Sorry, was he playing today ?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kash_a_ram_a_ding_dong Posted December 27, 2016 Share Posted December 27, 2016 Would have been 3.0 for us of he was...#missinglink Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harrowram Posted December 27, 2016 Share Posted December 27, 2016 Complete crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rambling Posted December 27, 2016 Share Posted December 27, 2016 He spoke briefly with Mac & Powell after the game, probably nothing in it ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam the Ram Posted December 27, 2016 Share Posted December 27, 2016 4 minutes ago, Rambling said: He spoke briefly with Mac & Powell after the game, probably nothing in it ???? He's just signed for them permanently a week ago so I doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zag zig Posted December 27, 2016 Share Posted December 27, 2016 1 hour ago, Harrowram said: Complete crap. He's an average player at this level, will probably do ok to average in any team that plays long ball tactics and chief threat evolves around set pieces. Will struggle against organised defences, with decent centre backs; sat thinking he was just another Zigic today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.