Strovolos Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 http://tinyurl.com/jkfp2cx Don't count for jack in the Play-offs, mind!! Can't wait!! May the best team win! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ram59 Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 As long as it is Derby! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarRam Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Interesting stats. Shows you how well we are doing. All that matters now is the play offs. I feel really confident that we have nothing to fear from any of the other 3 teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rampage Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 I will change my mind on the scores tomorrow. Sheff Wed 0 - 0 Brighton Brighton 2 - 1 Sheff Wed Brighton win on aggregate 2 - 1 -------------------------------------- DCFC 1 - 1 Hull Hull 2 -1 DCFC (AET) Hull win on aggregate 3 - 2 -------------------------------------- Brighton 2 - 0 Hull -------------------------------------- Concrete 4:1 mix v Concrete 3 :1 mix Concrete 4:1 mix win on aggregate Played at Hilton Gravel Pits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 11 hours ago, Rampage said: I will change my mind on the scores tomorrow. Sheff Wed 0 - 0 Brighton Brighton 2 - 1 Sheff Wed Brighton win on aggregate 2 - 1 -------------------------------------- DCFC 1 - 1 Hull Hull 2 -1 DCFC (AET) Hull win on aggregate 3 - 2 -------------------------------------- Brighton 2 - 0 Hull -------------------------------------- Concrete 4:1 mix v Concrete 3 :1 mix Concrete 4:1 mix win on aggregate Played at Hilton Gravel Pits If we went to extra time with Hull I wouldn't be able to handle it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahalftimereport Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Difficult to see how we (Hull) didn't walk it based on those graphs, and anyone would think Burnley were mid table looking at them. Just shows how important it is to take your chances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kernow Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 4 minutes ago, ahalftimereport said: Difficult to see how we (Hull) didn't walk it based on those graphs, and anyone would think Burnley were mid table looking at them. Just shows how important it is to take your chances. I think the graph compared to actual table suggests more that the graph is a load of **** that tells us very little rather than telling us that Hull should have walked it. Burnley, the champions should be closer to the relegation and Reading should be automatically promoted? Probably not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OohMartWright Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Didn't someone once say "There are lies, damned lies and statistics" ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevin Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 6 minutes ago, OohMartWright said: Didn't someone once say "There are lies, damned lies and statistics" ? Disraeli I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahalftimereport Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 45 minutes ago, Kernow said: I think the graph compared to actual table suggests more that the graph is a load of **** that tells us very little rather than telling us that Hull should have walked it. Burnley, the champions should be closer to the relegation and Reading should be automatically promoted? Probably not. Think that's a little harsh. The stats certainly show that Burnley were the most clinical team in front of goal whilst we were very poor. Their shots/goals ratio is very impressive and shows why they won the league. Obviously the stats don't tell the full story but I found some of those quite interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kernow Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 40 minutes ago, ahalftimereport said: Think that's a little harsh. The stats certainly show that Burnley were the most clinical team in front of goal whilst we were very poor. Their shots/goals ratio is very impressive and shows why they won the league. Obviously the stats don't tell the full story but I found some of those quite interesting. Interesting in a way. But when you look at the real life positions of the teams vs some of the positions they have on the graph, you can conclude that it doesn't really give an indication of where a team should or shouldn't be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Gives more of an impression of how teams play than how many points they got. They illustrate a few pints but don't tell a whole story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahalftimereport Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 1 hour ago, RadioactiveWaste said: Gives more of an impression of how teams play than how many points they got. They illustrate a few pints but don't tell a whole story. Don't think stats can ever tell the whole story, still found them interesting myself. Didn't surprise me a great deal though, from watching Burnley this season they take their chances despite not creating a great deal, whilst we're the opposite, they're also pretty good from set pieces. Still didn't expect there to be such a disparity between ourselves and the rest of the league, we look like an anomaly on 3/4 of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 1 hour ago, RadioactiveWaste said: Gives more of an impression of how teams play than how many points they got. They illustrate a few pints but don't tell a whole story. I'm going to illustrate a Straffe Hendrik Quadrupel now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jortat Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 I read somewhere that 50% of all statistics were inaccurate 100 % of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbrianRam Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 4 hours ago, Kernow said: I think the graph compared to actual table suggests more that the graph is a load of **** that tells us very little rather than telling us that Hull should have walked it. Burnley, the champions should be closer to the relegation and Reading should be automatically promoted? Probably not. Interested too see where Leicester are the PL one, compared to say Everton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 It's good. Gives you a rough idea of how aggressive a team plays. But the problem with stats is for example they tell you where the shot/ pass went. Not whether it was actually any good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Ram Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 18 hours ago, Rampage said: I will change my mind on the scores tomorrow. Sheff Wed 0 - 0 Brighton Brighton 2 - 1 Sheff Wed Brighton win on aggregate 2 - 1 -------------------------------------- DCFC 1 - 1 Hull Hull 2 -1 DCFC (AET) Hull win on aggregate 3 - 2 -------------------------------------- Brighton 2 - 0 Hull -------------------------------------- Concrete 4:1 mix v Concrete 3 :1 mix Concrete 4:1 mix win on aggregate Played at Hilton Gravel Pits You do realise concrete is sand, stone and cement, three parts? Mortar and bedding is two part They vary on flexibilty and strength dependant on sand & water content etc, no offence i dont know what 4:1 or 3:1 means or is trying to say. id know if C25, C40 or an RC was specified Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbrianRam Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 15 minutes ago, Alpha said: It's good. Gives you a rough idea of how aggressive a team plays. But the problem with stats is for example they tell you where the shot/ pass went. Not whether it was actually any good. That is why I had assist stats, was the assist a simple pass, or a great piece of technique, or a lucky move? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strovolos Posted May 9, 2016 Author Share Posted May 9, 2016 5 hours ago, ahalftimereport said: Difficult to see how we (Hull) didn't walk it based on those graphs, and anyone would think Burnley were mid table looking at them. Just shows how important it is to take your chances. The truth is, with our squad, we should have walked that league. That's not arrogance just fact if you look at the players. And whilst I love Steve Bruce, the the fact is that he has failed this season because he has not maintained enough consistency. All that is water under the bridge now and we are faced with the lottery of the play-offs and to be honest, I think it's too close to call between the Rams and the Tigers. Can't wait though!!! :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.