Wingers !!

[Keepyuppy]

I really think we need to get at least one out and out winger in on loan. Someone who can add to the squad, that can either start or come on to use pass and specialist  skills in being able to cross balls from wide positions and/or get to the byline and pull crossed back across the goalmouth. Also have we got anyone who can actually take a decent corner. We don't seem to be able to utilise the avantage that a corner kick should do. Too often corners are too long or go straight towards the keeper who either catches or punches clear. 

If we can get a decent out and out winger who is able to take a player on and beat him on the outside, it gives the midfield more time to get forward and support our striker, who is often isolated. 

We seem to be very predictable in cutting in from wide positions and running in to defenders or having no options for a shot or decent final ball. 

Am I on my own in thinking this ?. 

[DEL]

No need a loan but reckon Razza Camera coming to us as from what I read but who knows though. Just 1 signing for me. 

[Phoenix]

Oops. Misread it as whingers.

[TheDeadlySaul]

5 minutes ago, Phoenix said:

Oops. Misread it as whingers.

We have to many of them.

[sage]

1 minute ago, TheDeadlySaul said:

We have too many of them.

Too many Grammar Nazis too. 

[ValeRam]

Just now, sage said:

Too many Grammar Nazis too. 

No capital G required,  neither is  duplication of the to-infinitive too word

[sage]

17 minutes ago, ValeRam said:

No capital G required,  neither is  duplication of the to-infinitive too word

Of course a capital G is needed. It's a title. The too is fine too. 

[Guest]

4 minutes ago, sage said:

Of course a capital G is needed. It's a title. The too is fine too. 

Is the too two to many?

[RamNut]

We need gingers?

 

[sage]

14 minutes ago, Strange yearnings said:

Is the too two to many?

Not for Desmond.

[ValeRam]

20 minutes ago, sage said:

Of course a capital G is needed. It's a title. The too is fine too. 

humour bypass ?

[ValeRam]

17 minutes ago, Strange yearnings said:

Is the too two to many?

Just wait till @Rampage gets stuck into this…...

[sage]

3 minutes ago, ValeRam said:

humour bypass ?

No thanks. Yours seems to have had detrimental effects. 

[Rampage]

19 hours ago, ValeRam said:

Just wait till @Rampage gets stuck into this…...

 

19 hours ago, ValeRam said:

 

Strange Yearnings :- Is the too two to many?

Quote from Desmond Tutu ( inventor of the One and only, Four,Two Two, too formation. He played four guys in Tutus and two upfront:- You too, (not U2 or You two) can play in midfield, is what he said. Restricted movement in the Tutus  and the level of ribald abuse from fans, both home and away, led to the early demise of the system, although some of the players felt that wearing the Tutus at home was not a problem and who can blame them? You could say, You too, Brute but that is too classical for some. I feel that the 'too two to' many could have been either one Tutu too many to some or two tutus too many to U2. As for me I wrote this after a long drive and feel too that it could be two toos to many. I will get my tutu, too.

[i-Ram]

7 minutes ago, Rampage said:

Strange Yearnings :- Is the too two to many?

Quote from Desmond Tutu ( inventor of the One and only, Four,Two Two, too formation. He played four guys in Tutus and two upfront:- You too, (not U2 or You two) can play in midfield, is what he said. Restricted movement in the Tutus  and the level of ribald abuse from fans, both home and away, led to the early demise of the system, although some of the players felt that wearing the Tutus at home was not a problem and who can blame them? You could say, You too, Brute but that is too classical for some. I feel that the 'too two to' many could have been either one Tutu too many to some or two tutus too many to U2. As for me I wrote this after a long drive and feel too that it could be two toos to many. I will get my tutu, too.

Nurse!