Jump to content

We seem to have a.......


Mafiabob

Recommended Posts

Posted

Plan B... Maybe even a Plan C...

Thought I would be positive instead of the relentless pursuit of trying to be proved right on why "insert scapegoat here" is awful etc...

Seemed a third plan sprung up last night... Lingard playing just behind the main striker...

Subbing DM and replacing with very attacking player (Bryson)...

Just goes to show... We can adapt if necessary...

So please take your player bashing elsewhere...

Regards

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

We're already have plan B for ages and some of our so called fans thinks we don't lol.

Posted

Playing 11 outfield players and no keeper used to work wonders on early Champ Manager games, a kind of 3-4-1-3 formation, we should adopt this.

 

Why doesn't Mac go for it?

Posted

I'd like to see us have a plan D. 2-3-5 all out attack. We'd clean up time and time again!

I'm with RR on this one.

Inside left, inside right, outside left, outside right, left back, right back, left half, right half, centre half and Tommy Powell.....................worked ok for Harry Storer and Tim Ward!

Posted

When did stop being the usual formation?

The second half at Rotherham he played 4411 with a midfield without a holding player.

Ince Bryson Hughes Dawkins

Lingard

Bent

Lingard was free to roam, he and Dawkins exchanged positions a lot.

Posted

I'd argue it just turned into the 4-2-4 we saw time after time last year. Ince, Bent, Lingard and Dawkins all up to with Hughes and Bryson dropping deep to get the ball and recycle it from side to side. Nothing earth-shatteringly different what we had seen previously.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...