Jump to content

England one dayers


Ovis aries

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply

But that's been the case for years and despite a coaching team of thousands, it remains the case. England always look genuinely surprised when the ball spins as if some kind of witchcraft is at play.

Nobody has the skill or the bravery to go down the pitch and disrupt their rhythm.

Also, England's top six is made up of players who need time to build an innings. So, if there's help for the bowlers and wickets fall, not only are we in trouble wickets-wise, but we suddenly need ten an over to get a half decent score.

We need a one-day side full of specialists not test players trying to adapt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a diabolical England one day side and Cook is hopeless.

Ali did his best with a good innings and Morgan and Root did ok

England 202-9. 47.3 overs.

To be honest the batting is awful in the main for 50 over stuff.

Looks like 3-0 after 4 games to India unless England bowlers produce a miracle

Just not good enough and we have no chance in the World Cup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you think is wrong with them.

Too many Test players trying to play one day cricket , sack most of them , get the specialists in.

You have to have players that consistently score a run a ball , even if they only score 30 or 40 , do not want players that think it is great to score a century in 150/60 balls , no good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you think is wrong with them.

 

I don't think we've ever had clear thinking with our one-day team. Even when we've reached world cup finals, I've never actually thought we'd win.

 

Now we've been totally left behind. Primarily because our top players have not been allowed to play in the IPL. Now our top players are unable to play at such intensity and under so much pressure. They are simply not used to it. Compare the atmosphere at a cloudy Southampton with Calcutta.  The ECB completely missed the boat on this and now nobody would pick (e.g.) Ian Bell or Alistair Cook over even 3rd or 4th string Australian batsmen.

 

The main problem is one of ability. The second problem is one of outlook. Much as an army starts fighting a war in the same way as it fought the last one, so England cricket, never a hotbed of redial thinking, has found itself always a step behind. Picking occasional bowlers who bat well, pinch-hitters, opening the bowling with spin are just some of the innovations England have ummed and aahhed about long after others have moved on. And I could go on.

 

We need to be prepared to have a go. We need a captain and a coach and a regime that is prepared to risk, prepared to risk being all out for 70 in the pursuit of scores of over 300. We don't need the meek (Cook) the technical (Moores) or the moronic (Downton). We need adventurers. If we are to get rubbish scores, then let's at least look like we were trying to get big scores. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buttler runs himself out on 49.

England 265-6. 47 overs

Root gets 100 on his own ground.

He's out caught on 113

Doubt England will get enough

Looks like a 4-0 series win to India. .

We start too slow.

But at least we are having a go today and Woakes and Stokes hitting boundaries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...