rynny

I have read the thread. I've seen you take offence on behalf of Sibley, I've seen you not realise that it was a joke, I've seen your post where you get snotty when people have told you it was a joke, I've seen your post that clearly shows you haven't watched the interview. I've seen your posts that deflect away from the point, which it was joke. A joke that he had already said to Sibley, before the interview. You questioned if there is doubt that it was a joke it shouldn't have been said. There was no doubt, if you had watched the interview. My first post was to show you that it was a joke, but you can't admit that you were wrong, but you were wrong because you weren't given the full details of the interview, and had clearly not watched it. But whatever, I'm done.

I have read the thread. I've seen you take offence on behalf of Sibley, I've seen you not realise that it was a joke, I've seen your post where you get snotty when people have told you it was a joke, I've seen your post that clearly shows you haven't watched the interview. I've seen your posts that deflect away from the point, which it was joke. A joke that he had already said to Sibley, before the interview. You questioned if there is doubt that it was a joke it shouldn't have been said. There was no doubt, if you had watched the interview. My first post was to show you that it was a joke, but you can't admit that you were wrong, but you were wrong because you weren't given the full details of the interview, and had clearly not watched it. But whatever, I'm done.

I have read the thread. I've seen you take offence on behalf of Sibley, I've seen you not realise that it was a joke, I've seen your post where you get snotty when people have told you it was a joke, I've seen your post that clearly shows you haven't watched the interview. I've seen your posts that deflect away from the point, which it was joke. A joke that he had already said to Sibley, before the interview. You questioned if there is doubt that it was a joke it shouldn't have been said. There was no doubt, if you had watched the interview. My first post was to show you that it was a joke, but you can't admit that you were wrong, but you were wrong because you weren't given the full details of the interview, and had clearly not watched it. But whatever, I'm done.

Seriously?!? It was clearly a joke. You've obviously not watched the interview, and you are taking offence on behalf of Sibley without knowing his feelings. You are taking this completely out of proportion, which is no great surprise to be honest, as it feels like you look for any reason to post negativity about Warne.

Warne actually said "I'm glad he scored because if he hadn't scored he would have been in deep because he could have put Birdy in, so erm, (Warne cracks a big smile) he knew I was going to say that, so yeah really pleased for Sibs"

Show me where I keep going on about your opinion. In fact show me the last time we had any interaction, it will have been months because I have avoided having any discussions on the forum for quite a while because all I seem to get in return is snotty replies.
I have posted twice on this whole thread (prior to this one) once with what Warne fully said about Sibley's goal, as to me it seemed as though you hadn't watched the interview and had only read part of it which did seem like Warne was calling Sibley, and the other was in response to that post, where you are having a dig at Warne for having a joke, that clearly he has already had with Sibley prior to the interview. In my opinion, Warne wouldn't have made the joke if Sibley did not take it the way it was meant to, you know, as a joke.
 

Show me where I keep going on about your opinion. In fact show me the last time we had any interaction, it will have been months because I have avoided having any discussions on the forum for quite a while because all I seem to get in return is snotty replies.
I have posted twice on this whole thread (prior to this one) once with what Warne fully said about Sibley's goal, as to me it seemed as though you hadn't watched the interview and had only read part of it which did seem like Warne was calling Sibley, and the other was in response to that post, where you are having a dig at Warne for having a joke, that clearly he has already had with Sibley prior to the interview. In my opinion, Warne wouldn't have made the joke if Sibley did not take it the way it was meant to, you know, as a joke.
 

Show me where I keep going on about your opinion. In fact show me the last time we had any interaction, it will have been months because I have avoided having any discussions on the forum for quite a while because all I seem to get in return is snotty replies.
I have posted twice on this whole thread (prior to this one) once with what Warne fully said about Sibley's goal, as to me it seemed as though you hadn't watched the interview and had only read part of it which did seem like Warne was calling Sibley, and the other was in response to that post, where you are having a dig at Warne for having a joke, that clearly he has already had with Sibley prior to the interview. In my opinion, Warne wouldn't have made the joke if Sibley did not take it the way it was meant to, you know, as a joke.
 

Show me where I keep going on about your opinion. In fact show me the last time we had any interaction, it will have been months because I have avoided having any discussions on the forum for quite a while because all I seem to get in return is snotty replies.
I have posted twice on this whole thread (prior to this one) once with what Warne fully said about Sibley's goal, as to me it seemed as though you hadn't watched the interview and had only read part of it which did seem like Warne was calling Sibley, and the other was in response to that post, where you are having a dig at Warne for having a joke, that clearly he has already had with Sibley prior to the interview. In my opinion, Warne wouldn't have made the joke if Sibley did not take it the way it was meant to, you know, as a joke.
 

Show me where I keep going on about your opinion. In fact show me the last time we had any interaction, it will have been months because I have avoided having any discussions on the forum for quite a while because all I seem to get in return is snotty replies.
I have posted twice on this whole thread (prior to this one) once with what Warne fully said about Sibley's goal, as to me it seemed as though you hadn't watched the interview and had only read part of it which did seem like Warne was calling Sibley, and the other was in response to that post, where you are having a dig at Warne for having a joke, that clearly he has already had with Sibley prior to the interview. In my opinion, Warne wouldn't have made the joke if Sibley did not take it the way it was meant to, you know, as a joke.
 

Show me where I keep going on about your opinion. In fact show me the last time we had any interaction, it will have been months because I have avoided having any discussions on the forum for quite a while because all I seem to get in return is snotty replies.
I have posted twice on this whole thread (prior to this one) once with what Warne fully said about Sibley's goal, as to me it seemed as though you hadn't watched the interview and had only read part of it which did seem like Warne was calling Sibley, and the other was in response to that post, where you are having a dig at Warne for having a joke, that clearly he has already had with Sibley prior to the interview. In my opinion, Warne wouldn't have made the joke if Sibley did not take it the way it was meant to, you know, as a joke.
 

Show me where I keep going on about your opinion. In fact show me the last time we had any interaction, it will have been months because I have avoided having any discussions on the forum for quite a while because all I seem to get in return is snotty replies.
I have posted twice on this whole thread (prior to this one) once with what Warne fully said about Sibley's goal, as to me it seemed as though you hadn't watched the interview and had only read part of it which did seem like Warne was calling Sibley, and the other was in response to that post, where you are having a dig at Warne for having a joke, that clearly he has already had with Sibley prior to the interview. In my opinion, Warne wouldn't have made the joke if Sibley did not take it the way it was meant to, you know, as a joke.
 

Seriously?!? It was clearly a joke. You've obviously not watched the interview, and you are taking offence on behalf of Sibley without knowing his feelings. You are taking this completely out of proportion, which is no great surprise to be honest, as it feels like you look for any reason to post negativity about Warne.

Show me where I keep going on about your opinion. In fact show me the last time we had any interaction, it will have been months because I have avoided having any discussions on the forum for quite a while because all I seem to get in return is snotty replies.
I have posted twice on this whole thread (prior to this one) once with what Warne fully said about Sibley's goal, as to me it seemed as though you hadn't watched the interview and had only read part of it which did seem like Warne was calling Sibley, and the other was in response to that post, where you are having a dig at Warne for having a joke, that clearly he has already had with Sibley prior to the interview. In my opinion, Warne wouldn't have made the joke if Sibley did not take it the way it was meant to, you know, as a joke.
 

Seriously?!? It was clearly a joke. You've obviously not watched the interview, and you are taking offence on behalf of Sibley without knowing his feelings. You are taking this completely out of proportion, which is no great surprise to be honest, as it feels like you look for any reason to post negativity about Warne.

Regardless of system or personnel, I think we could have played Villa 10 times and we’d probably only have won once - likely on penalties.
They were largely superior all over. We gave them a scare last 15 minutes but it was too little, too late.
On the other hand, if West Brom had beaten Villa on penalties, in my mind we would have been favorites in the final as I thought they were poor on both occasions we beat them.
And I’m sure Villa were delighted we beat Leeds.
 

I'm sorry but Mason Bennet deserved to start the final, he had probably his best game for us in the semi final against Leeds, he played a big part in the first goal and won the penalty. His harassment and harrying of their defenders played a big part in their capitulation.
It always amazes me how it isn't picked up that the error was changing the dynamic of the midfield was a major factor to our performance against Villa, for me the inclusion of Huddlestone was more detrimental to our performance than Bennett starting. 

Seriously?!? It was clearly a joke. You've obviously not watched the interview, and you are taking offence on behalf of Sibley without knowing his feelings. You are taking this completely out of proportion, which is no great surprise to be honest, as it feels like you look for any reason to post negativity about Warne.

Yes Marriott deserved to start as well. For me the team should have been the one that we had on the field when Holmes went off injured against Leeds (bar, obviously, Cole for the suspended Malone) we should have kept the midfield 3 of Johnson, Mount and Wilson, Lawrence at the tip of the diamond and Marriott and Bennett up top.
It wasn't personal against Marriott, it was Lampard being cautious and putting a less attacking team out.

He’s quirky and interesting to me. He’s had a helluav job .. watching the pennies and at the same time the overwhelming expectations of this club. 
 
Looking at where we are now, I am happy as the famous Larry. I wasn’t earlier in the season, we had games when the players looked disinterested and lacked passion, a system wasn’t in place or working. Thing is, he has worked on it and the players have bought in. As to the humour .. excellent, love it. Bored to tears of managers who either rant and blame or alternatively sound like a mega corporations PR department. 

Warne actually said "I'm glad he scored because if he hadn't scored he would have been in deep because he could have put Birdy in, so erm, (Warne cracks a big smile) he knew I was going to say that, so yeah really pleased for Sibs"

I’m offended on behalf of vicars. 

Doesnt really matter if you doubt the joke or not, it’s what the players think of it. Evidence at the moment is that they’re together and they must have a good relationship. Not much else to it. You’re entitled to think it’s rubbish, and he’s entitled to not care in the slightest. 

More of this!