Hanny

But Ed Dawes has not been proven correct. The deal hasn't collapsed. If CK's money clears and hits the bank before any of the other supposed bidders puts a credible deal forward. Than that's it...CK owns the club. 
I personally don't give a rip who ends up owning the club. But the only person who has tried to get a deal done and has shown proof of funds, has been CK. If anyone else wants to do that- I'd be delighted! 

Large sums transferred internationally sometimes get hit with provenance checks. Doesn’t matter if it was acquired through stocks, paycheck, real estate, or Crypto. 
 
Crypto is pretty easy to show provenance. Since all transactions in crypto are publicly available. All CK would need to do is pull up and show the transaction hashes of when he sold the crypto and then the transaction hashes of when he then converted crypto into cash, and then the hash from  when he deposited that USD into a bank account. 
 
So, the holdup is on the clearing house confirming all of this. Nothing CK can do but wait for the money to clear. Once it does the sale is essentially complete.
 
Unless someone else wants to run up to Q with a cheque in hand that is the same amount or more then CK has proven and currently sat in a clearing house ?‍♂️

Of course, with any asset, the money had to come from somewhere at first. 
 
My point is, Crypto transactions are all public. It shows the movement of all the buys and sells. There would also be an initial transaction of turning cash into crypto.
 
Stock sales/Real Estate/etc are all behind a closed door. So technically would be easier to show what and where money came from through Crypto.
 

Of course, with any asset, the money had to come from somewhere at first. 
 
My point is, Crypto transactions are all public. It shows the movement of all the buys and sells. There would also be an initial transaction of turning cash into crypto.
 
Stock sales/Real Estate/etc are all behind a closed door. So technically would be easier to show what and where money came from through Crypto.
 

Of course, with any asset, the money had to come from somewhere at first. 
 
My point is, Crypto transactions are all public. It shows the movement of all the buys and sells. There would also be an initial transaction of turning cash into crypto.
 
Stock sales/Real Estate/etc are all behind a closed door. So technically would be easier to show what and where money came from through Crypto.
 

Large sums transferred internationally sometimes get hit with provenance checks. Doesn’t matter if it was acquired through stocks, paycheck, real estate, or Crypto. 
 
Crypto is pretty easy to show provenance. Since all transactions in crypto are publicly available. All CK would need to do is pull up and show the transaction hashes of when he sold the crypto and then the transaction hashes of when he then converted crypto into cash, and then the hash from  when he deposited that USD into a bank account. 
 
So, the holdup is on the clearing house confirming all of this. Nothing CK can do but wait for the money to clear. Once it does the sale is essentially complete.
 
Unless someone else wants to run up to Q with a cheque in hand that is the same amount or more then CK has proven and currently sat in a clearing house ?‍♂️

Large sums transferred internationally sometimes get hit with provenance checks. Doesn’t matter if it was acquired through stocks, paycheck, real estate, or Crypto. 
 
Crypto is pretty easy to show provenance. Since all transactions in crypto are publicly available. All CK would need to do is pull up and show the transaction hashes of when he sold the crypto and then the transaction hashes of when he then converted crypto into cash, and then the hash from  when he deposited that USD into a bank account. 
 
So, the holdup is on the clearing house confirming all of this. Nothing CK can do but wait for the money to clear. Once it does the sale is essentially complete.
 
Unless someone else wants to run up to Q with a cheque in hand that is the same amount or more then CK has proven and currently sat in a clearing house ?‍♂️

Large sums transferred internationally sometimes get hit with provenance checks. Doesn’t matter if it was acquired through stocks, paycheck, real estate, or Crypto. 
 
Crypto is pretty easy to show provenance. Since all transactions in crypto are publicly available. All CK would need to do is pull up and show the transaction hashes of when he sold the crypto and then the transaction hashes of when he then converted crypto into cash, and then the hash from  when he deposited that USD into a bank account. 
 
So, the holdup is on the clearing house confirming all of this. Nothing CK can do but wait for the money to clear. Once it does the sale is essentially complete.
 
Unless someone else wants to run up to Q with a cheque in hand that is the same amount or more then CK has proven and currently sat in a clearing house ?‍♂️

I understand that more information/details for (us) the general supporters would be nice. Especially how challenging this process has been. Yet, I just don't agree that CK needs to update anyone in this case.
The only thing that happened today, was a radio personality, and then some journos decided to spread fear, based on a routine process. Then everyone melted down. 
CK has no need to respond to conspiracy.
If a legit entity questioned a process or situation; then I would expect CK to respond. But not to wild speculation from radio folks and journos. 
Please rest easy tonight lad! We are all getting closer to a resolution. 
coyr

Surely I'm misunderstanding you. Dawes made a mess of an already messy situation, by making leading comments on the reason why the take over has yet to be completed. Nixon from many hours ago stated: There is a money holdup in the shape of provenance checks. Then all day long, he has kept stating the same thing: Nothing has changed, only that one thing still needs sorting. Even just a few minutes ago, Nixon again answering the same questions from people: Nothing has changed, still need the funds to be cleared. 
Nixon has been the most level headed Journo/voice today (and many days) when it has come to this particular Derby saga. 

So according to Alan Nixon we are still waiting for CKs transfer to be cleared by money laundering  people .
He has had to send it twice .
Ed Dawes yesterday reported that deal was about to collapse and CK was to lose his exclusivity.
It seemed later in the evening that clearance had been done.
CK didn’t speak when being doorstepped on leaving the 18th green other than saying no comment and it will all come out or something like that as he walked away.
To be honest it’s all rather tedious now .
CK and us fans can only wait for money clearance and if that doesn’t happen CK will lose money he has already spent on lawyers etc .
We are all waiting to see what happens still 
Up the Rams 

I understand that more information/details for (us) the general supporters would be nice. Especially how challenging this process has been. Yet, I just don't agree that CK needs to update anyone in this case.
The only thing that happened today, was a radio personality, and then some journos decided to spread fear, based on a routine process. Then everyone melted down. 
CK has no need to respond to conspiracy.
If a legit entity questioned a process or situation; then I would expect CK to respond. But not to wild speculation from radio folks and journos. 
Please rest easy tonight lad! We are all getting closer to a resolution. 
coyr

I'm confused here. When did Dawes make his leading statement? I am unsure when he officially said it. Because I know Nixon made his comments this am, well over 15 hours ago, and then continued to update people that nothing has changed all day long. To which, as we come to find out at the end of the day...nothing has changed. The money is being looked at for its provenance, as Nixon reported this morning.
Nixon made his comment early in the morning, then stood by it all day, stating nothing is really amiss here. It is another hurdle to over come. 
Dawes, made his inflammatory statement this morning that the whole deal is collapsing (based on the same details). Then decided to walk that statement back with a comment/tweet tonight, stating that he has been informed that maybe everything is still ok. 
How, with the two above approaches, are you possibly of the position to say Dawes is correct, or even close to being a leveled journo on this topic?

I understand that more information/details for (us) the general supporters would be nice. Especially how challenging this process has been. Yet, I just don't agree that CK needs to update anyone in this case.
The only thing that happened today, was a radio personality, and then some journos decided to spread fear, based on a routine process. Then everyone melted down. 
CK has no need to respond to conspiracy.
If a legit entity questioned a process or situation; then I would expect CK to respond. But not to wild speculation from radio folks and journos. 
Please rest easy tonight lad! We are all getting closer to a resolution. 
coyr

I'm confused here. When did Dawes make his leading statement? I am unsure when he officially said it. Because I know Nixon made his comments this am, well over 15 hours ago, and then continued to update people that nothing has changed all day long. To which, as we come to find out at the end of the day...nothing has changed. The money is being looked at for its provenance, as Nixon reported this morning.
Nixon made his comment early in the morning, then stood by it all day, stating nothing is really amiss here. It is another hurdle to over come. 
Dawes, made his inflammatory statement this morning that the whole deal is collapsing (based on the same details). Then decided to walk that statement back with a comment/tweet tonight, stating that he has been informed that maybe everything is still ok. 
How, with the two above approaches, are you possibly of the position to say Dawes is correct, or even close to being a leveled journo on this topic?

I'm confused here. When did Dawes make his leading statement? I am unsure when he officially said it. Because I know Nixon made his comments this am, well over 15 hours ago, and then continued to update people that nothing has changed all day long. To which, as we come to find out at the end of the day...nothing has changed. The money is being looked at for its provenance, as Nixon reported this morning.
Nixon made his comment early in the morning, then stood by it all day, stating nothing is really amiss here. It is another hurdle to over come. 
Dawes, made his inflammatory statement this morning that the whole deal is collapsing (based on the same details). Then decided to walk that statement back with a comment/tweet tonight, stating that he has been informed that maybe everything is still ok. 
How, with the two above approaches, are you possibly of the position to say Dawes is correct, or even close to being a leveled journo on this topic?

I'm confused here. When did Dawes make his leading statement? I am unsure when he officially said it. Because I know Nixon made his comments this am, well over 15 hours ago, and then continued to update people that nothing has changed all day long. To which, as we come to find out at the end of the day...nothing has changed. The money is being looked at for its provenance, as Nixon reported this morning.
Nixon made his comment early in the morning, then stood by it all day, stating nothing is really amiss here. It is another hurdle to over come. 
Dawes, made his inflammatory statement this morning that the whole deal is collapsing (based on the same details). Then decided to walk that statement back with a comment/tweet tonight, stating that he has been informed that maybe everything is still ok. 
How, with the two above approaches, are you possibly of the position to say Dawes is correct, or even close to being a leveled journo on this topic?

I understand that more information/details for (us) the general supporters would be nice. Especially how challenging this process has been. Yet, I just don't agree that CK needs to update anyone in this case.
The only thing that happened today, was a radio personality, and then some journos decided to spread fear, based on a routine process. Then everyone melted down. 
CK has no need to respond to conspiracy.
If a legit entity questioned a process or situation; then I would expect CK to respond. But not to wild speculation from radio folks and journos. 
Please rest easy tonight lad! We are all getting closer to a resolution. 
coyr

I'm confused here. When did Dawes make his leading statement? I am unsure when he officially said it. Because I know Nixon made his comments this am, well over 15 hours ago, and then continued to update people that nothing has changed all day long. To which, as we come to find out at the end of the day...nothing has changed. The money is being looked at for its provenance, as Nixon reported this morning.
Nixon made his comment early in the morning, then stood by it all day, stating nothing is really amiss here. It is another hurdle to over come. 
Dawes, made his inflammatory statement this morning that the whole deal is collapsing (based on the same details). Then decided to walk that statement back with a comment/tweet tonight, stating that he has been informed that maybe everything is still ok. 
How, with the two above approaches, are you possibly of the position to say Dawes is correct, or even close to being a leveled journo on this topic?

I'm confused here. When did Dawes make his leading statement? I am unsure when he officially said it. Because I know Nixon made his comments this am, well over 15 hours ago, and then continued to update people that nothing has changed all day long. To which, as we come to find out at the end of the day...nothing has changed. The money is being looked at for its provenance, as Nixon reported this morning.
Nixon made his comment early in the morning, then stood by it all day, stating nothing is really amiss here. It is another hurdle to over come. 
Dawes, made his inflammatory statement this morning that the whole deal is collapsing (based on the same details). Then decided to walk that statement back with a comment/tweet tonight, stating that he has been informed that maybe everything is still ok. 
How, with the two above approaches, are you possibly of the position to say Dawes is correct, or even close to being a leveled journo on this topic?

Ed Dawes is a shocking "journalist", it's mind numbingly poor. Why on earth would you make such a strong statement this morning and then wind it back in less than a day? Bad for all parties involved. 

It should be pretty basic for someone in Dawes position to not make an absolute doomsday statement without absolute certainty? 

I'm confused here. When did Dawes make his leading statement? I am unsure when he officially said it. Because I know Nixon made his comments this am, well over 15 hours ago, and then continued to update people that nothing has changed all day long. To which, as we come to find out at the end of the day...nothing has changed. The money is being looked at for its provenance, as Nixon reported this morning.
Nixon made his comment early in the morning, then stood by it all day, stating nothing is really amiss here. It is another hurdle to over come. 
Dawes, made his inflammatory statement this morning that the whole deal is collapsing (based on the same details). Then decided to walk that statement back with a comment/tweet tonight, stating that he has been informed that maybe everything is still ok. 
How, with the two above approaches, are you possibly of the position to say Dawes is correct, or even close to being a leveled journo on this topic?

I've kept quiet on this as thought best to see how things play out. 
One thing a lot of people seem to be completely forgetting on this, is that contracts have been exchanged, conditional on the ground sale.
Therefore, unless it is the ground sale that stops the transaction from progressing, CK is on the hook.
Not sure why anyone thinks he would exchange contracts if he did not have the money to back it up.
Out of interest, to anyone that has spent the day abusing CK, how will you now react to him if the purchase goes ahead?

Surely I'm misunderstanding you. Dawes made a mess of an already messy situation, by making leading comments on the reason why the take over has yet to be completed. Nixon from many hours ago stated: There is a money holdup in the shape of provenance checks. Then all day long, he has kept stating the same thing: Nothing has changed, only that one thing still needs sorting. Even just a few minutes ago, Nixon again answering the same questions from people: Nothing has changed, still need the funds to be cleared. 
Nixon has been the most level headed Journo/voice today (and many days) when it has come to this particular Derby saga.