Gaspode

Bernard Cribbins dies at 93 - a true national treasure....

Bernard Cribbins dies at 93 - a true national treasure....

Yeah, it’s the shorts that are pink.

Ah, so you're suggesting that any player that "doesn't want to play for us" should simply be released? - regardless of the length of their contract ; how much we paid for them; what their possible resale value is? That will make the football transfer market an interesting place....good grief

Ah, so you're suggesting that any player that "doesn't want to play for us" should simply be released? - regardless of the length of their contract ; how much we paid for them; what their possible resale value is? That will make the football transfer market an interesting place....good grief

Ah, so you're suggesting that any player that "doesn't want to play for us" should simply be released? - regardless of the length of their contract ; how much we paid for them; what their possible resale value is? That will make the football transfer market an interesting place....good grief

Ah, so you're suggesting that any player that "doesn't want to play for us" should simply be released? - regardless of the length of their contract ; how much we paid for them; what their possible resale value is? That will make the football transfer market an interesting place....good grief

Ah, so you're suggesting that any player that "doesn't want to play for us" should simply be released? - regardless of the length of their contract ; how much we paid for them; what their possible resale value is? That will make the football transfer market an interesting place....good grief

Ah, so you're suggesting that any player that "doesn't want to play for us" should simply be released? - regardless of the length of their contract ; how much we paid for them; what their possible resale value is? That will make the football transfer market an interesting place....good grief

You thought it was the policewoman sniffing your groin?

I was subjected to a police dog shoving its nose into my groin when we played Stoke a couple of years ago. I thought it was just being friendly so I reached down to scratch it’s head only to be given a right telling off by the accompanying bolshy policewoman. Perhaps if she’d explained it was a sniffer dog and asked if I minded being searched I might have reacted more favourably….

How about we don’t even to start to have such negative thoughts yet and we close this thread?
Just sayin.

If you’re suggesting that the fans damaged Roos’s confidence, can I just point out that he started it…..

If you’re suggesting that the fans damaged Roos’s confidence, can I just point out that he started it…..

If you’re suggesting that the fans damaged Roos’s confidence, can I just point out that he started it…..

If you’re suggesting that the fans damaged Roos’s confidence, can I just point out that he started it…..

If you’re suggesting that the fans damaged Roos’s confidence, can I just point out that he started it…..

If you’re suggesting that the fans damaged Roos’s confidence, can I just point out that he started it…..

TOP TIP:
Lightly coat the new card with a couple of layers of sarcasm.  If you don't have any, I think @G STAR RAM has some going spare.
?

I'd be depressed if I suddenly realised that the gravy train I'd been riding for 5 years based on nothing more than having a famous cousin seemed to be grinding to a screeching halt. Fire up the tiny violin concerto.

They'll have almost certainly stumped up a huge signing on bonus for him though - and as West Ham were alledgedly talking about £150K per week (and possbly a longer contract), I think the lowball (relative!) wage agreements being quoted may be wide of the mark.
Great signing if (BIG IF!) they get the West Ham version rather than the mardy, petulant, can't be bothered version that's been on show too often in his career - and if signing him on such huge wages doesn't destroy moral in the rest of their squad....

Good, let him rot for a year.

Sometimes what that person does is a cry out for help.

People would stop giving the 'council a kicking' if they didn't c***-up so often and if they occassionally held their hands up and admitted that they'd made a mistake. Implying to the OP that they're doing them a favour by cancelling an unwarranted fine only adds to the desire to kick them up the backside....

The problem is that you're assuming the council are capable of logic....
They know they screwed up, but they're not going to publicly admit that as they'd have to cancel all the tickets/refund everyone - as it stands, they can sit back and wait for people to contact them for a refund.....and keep the money from those that pay up without making a fuss....
If I was you, I'd contact the DET - they'd love a story about the council that claims to supportt the club issuing fines to fans that have legitimately paid for their parking....