Jump to content

StarterForTen

Member
  • Posts

    431
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    StarterForTen got a reaction from Ken Tram in Jason Knight scan   
    Only problem with that is it would bring in an additional wage burden, and the whole point of an EFL embargo on signings is to control costs. 
  2. Like
    StarterForTen got a reaction from r_wilcockson in Yankee Doodle Derby   
    Surely not all trial lists will get taken on though. The whole point is to see players close up before moving forward with your preferred options. There will be plenty more over the next six weeks - and let's be honest there is going to be great value in the Free Agents market come September 1st as there will be more players without clubs than ever before.
  3. COYR
    StarterForTen got a reaction from Reggie Greenwood in Yankee Doodle Derby   
    Surely not all trial lists will get taken on though. The whole point is to see players close up before moving forward with your preferred options. There will be plenty more over the next six weeks - and let's be honest there is going to be great value in the Free Agents market come September 1st as there will be more players without clubs than ever before.
  4. Clap
    StarterForTen got a reaction from RoyMac5 in It's not 5 it's 4! Choose again.   
    How is Festy Ebosele on the list? I thought he was out of contract with new terms offered?
    How can he have signed when others offered new terms (Wisdom, Davies, etc) aren't allowed?
    Have I missed something?
  5. Like
    StarterForTen got a reaction from ram59 in Choose your 5   
    Mengi has to be one of them; we need pace at the back.
    And wages can't be a particular problem as we can't pay more than £600k/season for any player.
  6. Like
    StarterForTen got a reaction from therealhantsram in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    Quick question... can we loan players OUT?
    ...If we set up our young players of 'professional standing' that clearly aren't at Championship standing with loans to non-League clubs at an appropriate level, do they not count as part of our quota?
  7. Clap
    StarterForTen got a reaction from Ramslad1992 in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    The EFL's rule on the minimum strength of a playing squad even for a club under an embargo is there to protect the integrity of the competition. By including the players used for the Chorley game in calculating Derby's current squad strength they would be arguing against the very reason the rule was introduced in the first place.
    If Derby had fielded the same team they did for the Chorley game for an end of season match with little consequence to the Rams (but possibly could effect other issues i the division) they would be done for fielding an under-strength team.
  8. Like
    StarterForTen got a reaction from Carl Sagan in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    Quick question... can we loan players OUT?
    ...If we set up our young players of 'professional standing' that clearly aren't at Championship standing with loans to non-League clubs at an appropriate level, do they not count as part of our quota?
  9. Like
    StarterForTen got a reaction from CBRammette in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    The EFL's rule on the minimum strength of a playing squad even for a club under an embargo is there to protect the integrity of the competition. By including the players used for the Chorley game in calculating Derby's current squad strength they would be arguing against the very reason the rule was introduced in the first place.
    If Derby had fielded the same team they did for the Chorley game for an end of season match with little consequence to the Rams (but possibly could effect other issues i the division) they would be done for fielding an under-strength team.
  10. Clap
    StarterForTen got a reaction from Premier ram in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    The EFL's rule on the minimum strength of a playing squad even for a club under an embargo is there to protect the integrity of the competition. By including the players used for the Chorley game in calculating Derby's current squad strength they would be arguing against the very reason the rule was introduced in the first place.
    If Derby had fielded the same team they did for the Chorley game for an end of season match with little consequence to the Rams (but possibly could effect other issues i the division) they would be done for fielding an under-strength team.
  11. Clap
    StarterForTen got a reaction from Seth's left foot in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    The EFL's rule on the minimum strength of a playing squad even for a club under an embargo is there to protect the integrity of the competition. By including the players used for the Chorley game in calculating Derby's current squad strength they would be arguing against the very reason the rule was introduced in the first place.
    If Derby had fielded the same team they did for the Chorley game for an end of season match with little consequence to the Rams (but possibly could effect other issues i the division) they would be done for fielding an under-strength team.
  12. Clap
    StarterForTen got a reaction from Foreveram in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    The EFL's rule on the minimum strength of a playing squad even for a club under an embargo is there to protect the integrity of the competition. By including the players used for the Chorley game in calculating Derby's current squad strength they would be arguing against the very reason the rule was introduced in the first place.
    If Derby had fielded the same team they did for the Chorley game for an end of season match with little consequence to the Rams (but possibly could effect other issues i the division) they would be done for fielding an under-strength team.
  13. Clap
    StarterForTen got a reaction from RoyMac5 in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    The EFL's rule on the minimum strength of a playing squad even for a club under an embargo is there to protect the integrity of the competition. By including the players used for the Chorley game in calculating Derby's current squad strength they would be arguing against the very reason the rule was introduced in the first place.
    If Derby had fielded the same team they did for the Chorley game for an end of season match with little consequence to the Rams (but possibly could effect other issues i the division) they would be done for fielding an under-strength team.
  14. Like
    StarterForTen got a reaction from angieram in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    The EFL's rule on the minimum strength of a playing squad even for a club under an embargo is there to protect the integrity of the competition. By including the players used for the Chorley game in calculating Derby's current squad strength they would be arguing against the very reason the rule was introduced in the first place.
    If Derby had fielded the same team they did for the Chorley game for an end of season match with little consequence to the Rams (but possibly could effect other issues i the division) they would be done for fielding an under-strength team.
  15. Like
    StarterForTen got a reaction from cosmic in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    The EFL's rule on the minimum strength of a playing squad even for a club under an embargo is there to protect the integrity of the competition. By including the players used for the Chorley game in calculating Derby's current squad strength they would be arguing against the very reason the rule was introduced in the first place.
    If Derby had fielded the same team they did for the Chorley game for an end of season match with little consequence to the Rams (but possibly could effect other issues i the division) they would be done for fielding an under-strength team.
  16. Like
    StarterForTen got a reaction from Carnero in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    The EFL's rule on the minimum strength of a playing squad even for a club under an embargo is there to protect the integrity of the competition. By including the players used for the Chorley game in calculating Derby's current squad strength they would be arguing against the very reason the rule was introduced in the first place.
    If Derby had fielded the same team they did for the Chorley game for an end of season match with little consequence to the Rams (but possibly could effect other issues i the division) they would be done for fielding an under-strength team.
  17. Like
    StarterForTen got a reaction from Andrew3000 in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    The EFL's rule on the minimum strength of a playing squad even for a club under an embargo is there to protect the integrity of the competition. By including the players used for the Chorley game in calculating Derby's current squad strength they would be arguing against the very reason the rule was introduced in the first place.
    If Derby had fielded the same team they did for the Chorley game for an end of season match with little consequence to the Rams (but possibly could effect other issues i the division) they would be done for fielding an under-strength team.
  18. Like
    StarterForTen got a reaction from Dean (hick) Saunders in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    The EFL's rule on the minimum strength of a playing squad even for a club under an embargo is there to protect the integrity of the competition. By including the players used for the Chorley game in calculating Derby's current squad strength they would be arguing against the very reason the rule was introduced in the first place.
    If Derby had fielded the same team they did for the Chorley game for an end of season match with little consequence to the Rams (but possibly could effect other issues i the division) they would be done for fielding an under-strength team.
  19. Haha
    StarterForTen got a reaction from TigerTedd in 2021 / 2022 New kit   
    ...or just a big 'For Sale' sign?
  20. Haha
    StarterForTen got a reaction from Ramslad1992 in 2021 / 2022 New kit   
    ...or just a big 'For Sale' sign?
  21. Haha
    StarterForTen got a reaction from Ted McMinn Football Genius in 2021 / 2022 New kit   
    ...or just a big 'For Sale' sign?
  22. Clap
    StarterForTen got a reaction from Spanish in 2021 / 2022 New kit   
    If the EFL get their way, our home kit will be the Wycombe home kit!
  23. Like
    StarterForTen got a reaction from Ghost of Clough in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    Excellent information.
    Your final sentence is the crux!
  24. Clap
    StarterForTen reacted to Ghost of Clough in Has the transfer embargo been lifted?   
    In the hope that they don't count our U23 game vs Chorley, I count 19 to have played in a real first team game: Marshall, Roos, Byrne, Ebosele, McDonald, Buchanan, Forsyth, JBrown, Knight, Bird, Bielik, Shinnie, Sibley, Watson, Hutchinson, Lawrence, Jozwiak, Kazim, Stretton
    Davies' extension would make it 20, Wisdom's 21.
    The Chorley game adds 8 to the list: Bardell, Williams, Solomon, LThompson, Aghatise, Ibrahim, Duncan, Cybulski
    I find it strange that a 'professional goalkeeper' is defined as someone with 5 starts, whereas someone of 'professional standing' only needs to have come on as a sub for the final second of a single game.
    Further down on the EFL page, it is stated considerations will be given in the circumstances of Academy players. Given 3 of the Chorley 8 are still 2nd year scholars, they should be exempt from the 'professional' list.
    They also state considerations will be made for Championship clubs with fewer than 24 'established players' - those with 5 starts. This would actually cut our list down to just 14, or 16 if Davies and Wisdom extend their deals. If excluding those under 21, it's even lower at 10.
    Summary: it's up to the EFL if they want to let us sign anyone
  25. Haha
    StarterForTen got a reaction from RadioactiveWaste in Wycombe threaten to sue and send us into admin. if we stay up!   
    So does the appeal decision now mean Wycombe are incoming with they £15m writ?
    Good luck with that!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.