Animal is a Ram Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 2 hours ago, drgoodspeak said: "We have <NAME> from <PLACE> on the line. What's your point?" "I've supported the Rams since <YEAR> and seen it all. I don't go to games but I listen to every match on the radio. I've worked for <YEARS> and if I'd put as much effort in as some of these players, I'd have been sacked. Here's what I think <HAPPENED/THE MANAGER SHOULD DO>....." 60% of your RD call-ins right there. Oi, that script is copyrighted. That template's been my biggest seller this season! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stive Pesley Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 21 hours ago, Strider said: What was the caller at 35:40 referring to? Was this the caller they cut off when he was saying something about Chris Martin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 1 hour ago, StivePesley said: Was this the caller they cut off when he was saying something about Chris Martin? Richard from Belper was cut off before the match, he was being very risqué Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazloW Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 [changed my mind] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
europia Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 10 minutes ago, LazloW said: What I find a little dissapointing about RD (and DET) in the current situation is the lack of investigation or reporting on what has 'really' happened. They seem content to sit back and rely on statements from the club and warning against speculation. The national press would've been digging around for sources and reported on that... local press, presumably, have to maontain relationships but its all a bit cosy. Sky seem to know more (or prepared to report more) than RD. Having said that, ive not listened today so maybe more has come out? They are not sports journalists just radio presenters, not great ones at that. Their output other than commentary / punditry is regurgitating rumour and speculation, then claiming it once something is substantiated. It's a fairly lame existence, but someone has to do it I guess.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stive Pesley Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 2 hours ago, StivePesley said: Was this the caller they cut off when he was saying something about Chris Martin? Ah - just realised that the caller they cut off when he was saying something about Chris Martin was after the game on Saturday not last night. Too much excitement! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stive Pesley Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 But it was at 35:40 as the OP said http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04705dj Some bloke called Kevin who said he was an impartial neutral, and then started talking about Chris Martin leaving and some legal ramifications that they can't talk about - at which point Owen Bradley has a massive panic and cuts him off! Interesting - he definitely sounded like he knew what the bloke was on about... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Sheriff Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 47 minutes ago, StivePesley said: But it was at 35:40 as the OP said http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04705dj Some bloke called Kevin who said he was an impartial neutral, and then started talking about Chris Martin leaving and some legal ramifications that they can't talk about - at which point Owen Bradley has a massive panic and cuts him off! Interesting - he definitely sounded like he knew what the bloke was on about... very interesting. What could it mean. anything to do with the clement rumours? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owen87ITK Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 56 minutes ago, StivePesley said: But it was at 35:40 as the OP said http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04705dj Some bloke called Kevin who said he was an impartial neutral, and then started talking about Chris Martin leaving and some legal ramifications that they can't talk about - at which point Owen Bradley has a massive panic and cuts him off! Interesting - he definitely sounded like he knew what the bloke was on about... *Sigh* No, no I didn't. And I don't think he did either, which is exactly why I cut him off. I think he was combining some of the ridiculous Clement rumours which Martin's departure (only six months between the two!) and putting 2 & 2 together to get 638. As far as I'm aware, Chris Martin moved to Fulham purely for footballing reasons. Despite europia's claim that we only deal in speculation and rumour, that actually isn't the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
europia Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 6 minutes ago, Simsy said: very interesting. What could it mean. anything to do with the clement rumours? Maybe recent events can start to 'put to bed' the Clement saga. This re occurring theme: players not happy with manager - chairman meeting with manager and told pick x, y, z and get playing 'Derby Way' - manager says get stuffed Mel - argument escalates - chairman wants to show who's boss - manager sacked / suspended etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 12 minutes ago, europia said: Maybe recent events can start to 'put to bed' the Clement saga. This re occurring theme: players not happy with manager - chairman meeting with manager and told pick x, y, z and get playing 'Derby Way' - manager says get stuffed Mel - argument escalates - chairman wants to show who's boss - manager sacked / suspended etc etc And you know this utter drivel for a fact? Some of you dimwits are just asking to be sued. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stive Pesley Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 24 minutes ago, OwenB87 said: *Sigh* No, no I didn't. And I don't think he did either, which is exactly why I cut him off. LOL - fair enough. Thanks for clarifying. I guess I mistook your exasperated tone as meaning you thought he might mention something under a super-injunction legal type embargo rather than just being exasperated that a nutter had got through to live on air Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lokidoki Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 23 minutes ago, OwenB87 said: *Sigh* No, no I didn't. And I don't think he did either, which is exactly why I cut him off. Well done OwenB. However I do think that the Clement saga and the present situation do leave the club looking like they are hiding the detail. It creates a situation open to conjecture. Finally the process within the club appears to be awry, what I mean is, since when do employees go to the chair when there is an apparent problem? Surely the final point of call is the CEO, who then may need to go to the board? If this is not happening, then why have a CEO? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
europia Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 8 minutes ago, eddie said: And you know this utter drivel for a fact? Some of you dimwits are just asking to be sued. Hmm interesting, you suggest potential litigation and in the same post make defamatory comment. Obviously the resident legal expert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lokidoki Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 Perhaps I did not explain myself previously, that in previous threads, those ITK, have stated that some players went to the chair directly about whatever this situation was, that developed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 47 minutes ago, OwenB87 said: *Sigh* No, no I didn't. And I don't think he did either, which is exactly why I cut him off. I think he was combining some of the ridiculous Clement rumours which Martin's departure (only six months between the two!) and putting 2 & 2 together to get 638. As far as I'm aware, Chris Martin moved to Fulham purely for footballing reasons. Despite europia's claim that we only deal in speculation and rumour, that actually isn't the case. Thanks - keep up the good work. Not the easiest job in the last couple of years since MM has taken over! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doodle Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 19 minutes ago, europia said: Hmm interesting, you suggest potential litigation and in the same post make defamatory comment. Obviously the resident legal expert. I think you will find calling someone a dimwit is not nor ever has been defamatory. I don't consider people who regurgitate idle speculation as fact, being in any position to feel slighted by the term dimwit. Dimwit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 32 minutes ago, europia said: Hmm interesting, you suggest potential litigation and in the same post make defamatory comment. Obviously the resident legal expert. Under common law, to constitute defamation, a claim must generally be false. I've seen nothing defamatory said by @eddie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamLad1884 Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 40 minutes ago, europia said: Hmm interesting, you suggest potential litigation and in the same post make defamatory comment. Obviously the resident legal expert. From an actual resident legal expert here, nothing he said could be held against him, he made no implications as to who he refers to, also you'd have a very hard time due to the various alias' involved with this site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 3 minutes ago, RamLad1884 said: From an actual resident legal expert here, nothing he said could be held against him, he made no implications as to who he refers to, also you'd have a very hard time due to the various alias' involved with this site. second part isn't true... email addresses and ISPs y'all, we got you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.