Animal is a Ram Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Objectively. Below both Forest (20th) and Leicester. (21st) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsdubs Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 That table is about 10-15 years old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal is a Ram Posted March 26, 2015 Author Share Posted March 26, 2015 Nope. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3011776/Are-Manchester-United-Liverpool-Arsenal-Chelsea-biggest-club-Sportsmail-s-study-finally-settles-football-s-great-debate.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsdubs Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 It just looks old, also look at the income rating for florest not sure how accurate that is. I'm also interested to see where they got their historical crowd data from. I imagine the 80s is part of our dip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_D Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 the way they score 'crowd' is a load of old nonsense for a start Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal is a Ram Posted March 26, 2015 Author Share Posted March 26, 2015 It just looks old, also look at the income rating for florest not sure how accurate that is. I'm also interested to see where they got their historical crowd data from. I imagine the 80s is part of our dip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsdubs Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Look at the player quality rating, England only? Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inverurie Ram Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 It's pish...........As for the Daily Mail....yeah they are good at ranking.......full of rank!AnimalisaRam for this you shouldn't be barred, but should be shot at by your local Choir boys with pea shooters after they've sung all the songs I've ever posted on this forum for the rest of your life........and more! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal is a Ram Posted March 26, 2015 Author Share Posted March 26, 2015 It's pish...........As for the Daily Mail....yeah they are good at ranking.......full of rank!AnimalisaRam for this you shouldn't be barred, but should be shot at by your local quoir boys with pea shooters after they've sung all the songs I've ever posted on this forum for the rest of your life........and more! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn5 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Leicester, Bolton, Blackburn, Stoke and Southampton above us is a Joke but thought West Brom was a misprintBirmingham and sheff Utd are also big clubs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoetheRam Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 How are Chelsea ranked 3rd for crowds? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inverurie Ram Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 I could say the same for some of your songs.. Choir boys indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LesterRam Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 what a load of ******** **** **** ****** **** and then I said to her "yes dear" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbrianRam Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Who cares, would much rather have a good team than big reputation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
curb Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Blackburn and Bolton above us should tell you all you need to know about that table. Two piss poor clubs that added together can't even match our number of season ticket holders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jono Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 can't agree with that Curb because some of the weighting for rank is based on history and most of the Lancs Mill town clubs have considerable history ... Bolton, Blackburn, PNE, Blackpool, Burnley et al.bottom line is I reckon our real position now along with our history, record and to tradition makes our rank in this table look pretty accurate. Can't figure Leicester though ? And Chelski as someone else said .. 3rd for crowds ? Surely not ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsdubs Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 It isn't massively far off but there are some anomalies there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WharfedaleRam Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Our play off hopes look iffy in this table! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTedd Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Not to worry, by the end of next season we'll have another year of prem football to add to our total (touch lots of wood, I think not enough people have been touching wood this season). Leicester a Forest won't. So we'll leapfrog them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Mills Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 I'd much rather be top of the premier league than top of this crock of **** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.e1137248055f4860a45521e03d96f7b5.thumb.jpg.2355a3b1794fd60ce9e1342e6d520be8.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.