DEL Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Nixon said the player is not available immediately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SparxTheRam Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Does that point to Lingard then? Not sure how long he is out for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lushrams Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 If both Bamford and Ibe join another Championship club on loan, what a farce that would be. Why would it be a farce? Have we officially come out and admitted interest in any of these players? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MACKWORTHRAM Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Exactly. Im glad we arent getting Bamford back. He scored a few decent strikes. But that just glossed over the fact that he offered us nothing. His work rate was appalling to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uptherams Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Exactly. Im glad we arent getting Bamford back. He scored a few decent strikes. But that just glossed over the fact that he offered us nothing. His work rate was appalling to. LOL. Stop overlooking the fact that he was a striker playing out wide. He not only scored goals but he also got assists too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Apart from his 8 goals and 4 assists. And it depends how you define workrate, you can still be a good player and a valuable asset to the team without running around like a headless chicken. That's whats wrong with English football imo, we have a preference for the physical side of the game over the technical for some reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uptherams Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Apart from his 8 goals and 4 assists. And it depends how you define workrate, you can still be a good player and a valuable asset to the team without running around like a headless chicken. That's whats wrong with English football imo, we have a preference for the physical side of the game over the technical for some reason. The guy was just criticizing our wingers lack of goal threat last season. Then lays into Bamford. Absolutely ridiculous. Idiocy or very short term memory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dale The Ram Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 PLEASE BE GNABRY!!!! I am hopefull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rammieib Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 I'll take 8 goals, 4 assists and little work rate right now.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEL Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Good player agreed but prem clubs want him on loan. Bananas Don't think Nixon was on about Lingard though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEL Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Bamford is matchwinner and offered nothing else. Glad he ain't coming back anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 You wouldn't want a match winner on our bench ready to come on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posh Ram Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 It'd be nice to get Bamford back, but I think we could get somebody better in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyinLiverpool Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Bamford is matchwinner and offered nothing else. Glad he ain't coming back anyway And who on earth would want a match winner in their team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peakram Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Ibe was at Brum last year, scored 1 in 11 games so doesn't seem to be much more end product than what we have already on that footing, plus cant remember him catching my eye in any highlights clips but suppose should be getting better all the time at his age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daz_The_Ram Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 And who on earth would want a match winner in their team? That exchange is truly delightful. No ... I'm with Derby_EnglandLoyal ... match winning strikers are over-rated. So '90s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott129 Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Exactly. Im glad we arent getting Bamford back. He scored a few decent strikes. But that just glossed over the fact that he offered us nothing. His work rate was appalling to. Interesting how you criticised our three wingers for not having an end product but then disregard Bamford for only having an end product Make your mind up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester Ram Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 C'mon guys, winning matches isn't going to win us the league, guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyinLiverpool Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 That exchange is truly delightful. No ... I'm with Derby_EnglandLoyal ... match winning strikers are over-rated. So '90s. There was another one somewhere from a different poster to the effect that Bamford scores a few goals but offers nothing. I am confused. Somebody help me out here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daz_The_Ram Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 There was another one somewhere from a different poster to the effect that Bamford scores a few goals but offers nothing. I am confused. Somebody help me out here. They say the football landscape is changing mate. Maybe I'm just getting old. That Gerd Muller was a bag of ***** wasn't he? All goals and no trousers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.